UNWPX vs. FGDIX
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX).
UNWPX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Nov 26, 1985. FGDIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 12, 2006.
Performance
UNWPX vs. FGDIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UNWPX vs. FGDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | -6.08% | 136.32% | 2.07% | -16.18% | -32.95% | -13.88% | 70.83% | 22.59% | -31.49% | -3.82% |
FGDIX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I | 1.81% | 142.97% | 14.91% | -0.39% | -13.42% | -10.45% | 26.84% | 35.51% | -12.96% | 8.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNWPX achieves a -6.08% return, which is significantly lower than FGDIX's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, UNWPX has underperformed FGDIX with an annualized return of 6.60%, while FGDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.04% annualized return.
UNWPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -25.00%
- YTD
- -6.08%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 81.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- 6.60%
FGDIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -25.43%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 84.61%
- 3Y*
- 36.42%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNWPX vs. FGDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNWPX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDIX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UNWPX vs. FGDIX — Risk / Return Rank
UNWPX
FGDIX
UNWPX vs. FGDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNWPX | FGDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 2.02 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 2.29 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.84 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.24 | 10.65 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNWPX | FGDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.02 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.62 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.43 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.15 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between UNWPX and FGDIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UNWPX vs. FGDIX - Dividend Comparison
UNWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than FGDIX's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 6.34% | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.74% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 17.45% | 28.55% | 0.33% | 9.84% |
FGDIX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I | 2.06% | 2.10% | 3.58% | 0.97% | 0.36% | 1.59% | 4.40% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 3.65% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UNWPX vs. FGDIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNWPX drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, which is greater than FGDIX's maximum drawdown of -77.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNWPX and FGDIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNWPX | FGDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.78% | -77.15% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.02% | -29.85% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.16% | -45.95% | -18.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -50.57% | -18.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.07% | -25.43% | -21.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.57% | -39.98% | -9.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 7.95% | -0.79% |
Volatility
UNWPX vs. FGDIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) is 14.61%, while Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that UNWPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UNWPX | FGDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.61% | 15.39% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.08% | 35.03% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.36% | 42.73% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.91% | 32.76% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 33.05% | -3.04% |