FGDIX vs. GLDM
FGDIX (Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both Gold funds. Over the past 5 years, FGDIX returned 16.95%/yr vs 18.18%/yr for GLDM. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGDIX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
FGDIX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGDIX achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -4.72% return.
FGDIX
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -6.92%
- 1Y
- 50.29%
- 3Y*
- 40.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
GLDM
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- -4.72%
- 6M
- -8.62%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- 28.79%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- —
FGDIX vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDIX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I | -2.10% | 142.97% | 14.91% | -0.39% | -13.42% | -10.45% | 26.84% | 35.51% | -3.88% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -4.72% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGDIX and GLDM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between FGDIX and GLDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGDIX vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
FGDIX
GLDM
FGDIX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGDIX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 0.89 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 2.40 | +1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGDIX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGDIX drawdown since its inception was -77.15%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDIX and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGDIX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.15% | -24.35% | -52.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.40% | -24.35% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.40% | -24.35% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.94% | -24.35% | -21.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.30% | -23.82% | -4.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.77% | -6.32% | -33.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.09% | 9.05% | +4.04% |
Volatility
FGDIX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) has a higher volatility of 17.05% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 8.16%. This indicates that FGDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGDIX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.05% | 8.16% | +8.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.81% | 24.22% | +13.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.09% | 27.36% | +17.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.10% | 18.15% | +15.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.39% | 17.02% | +16.37% |
FGDIX vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGDIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGDIX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
FGDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDIX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I | 5.15% | 2.10% | 3.58% | 0.97% | 0.36% | 1.59% | 4.40% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 3.65% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGDIX and GLDM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGDIX has higher volatility (17.05%) compared to GLDM (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDIX dropped -77.15% vs GLDM's -24.35%.
FGDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGDIX and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer