FGDIX vs. IAU

In the year-to-date period, FGDIX achieves a 50.35% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 25.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FGDIX has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 9.41%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 10.41% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FGDIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FGDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDIX and IAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FGDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FGDIX drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDIX and IAU.

Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) has a higher volatility of 13.24% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 7.91%. This indicates that FGDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.