PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNWPX vs. FEURX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNWPX vs. FEURX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNWPX achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than FEURX's -2.96% return.


UNWPX

1D
-1.03%
1M
-9.86%
YTD
7.34%
6M
5.41%
1Y
82.24%
3Y*
33.44%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
3.94%

FEURX

1D
-1.12%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-6.97%
1Y
49.24%
3Y*
37.18%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNWPX vs. FEURX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UNWPX
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund
7.34%136.32%2.07%-16.18%-32.95%-13.88%70.83%22.59%-31.49%-13.37%
FEURX
First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6
-2.96%129.09%10.69%7.37%-1.26%-7.42%30.08%38.92%-15.55%-1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between UNWPX and FEURX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.78

The correlation between UNWPX and FEURX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNWPX vs. FEURX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNWPX
UNWPX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
UNWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UNWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FEURX
FEURX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FEURX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEURX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEURX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FEURX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEURX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNWPX vs. FEURX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UNWPXFEURXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.56

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

4.26

+5.15

UNWPX vs. FEURX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNWPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the FEURX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNWPX and FEURX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNWPX vs. FEURX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNWPX drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, which is greater than FEURX's maximum drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNWPX and FEURX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNWPXFEURXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.78%

-36.99%

-46.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.02%

-32.34%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.17%

-32.34%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.80%

-33.93%

-26.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.51%

-26.96%

-12.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.47%

-12.78%

-36.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.77%

11.81%

-3.04%

Volatility

UNWPX vs. FEURX - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a higher volatility of 14.31% compared to First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX) at 13.39%. This indicates that UNWPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEURX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNWPXFEURXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.31%

13.39%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.62%

34.11%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.31%

39.83%

+4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.80%

29.12%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.60%

27.20%

+3.40%

UNWPX vs. FEURX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNWPX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FEURX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNWPX vs. FEURX - Dividend Comparison

UNWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.64%, more than FEURX's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEURX
First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6
1.29%1.26%5.39%1.17%0.00%1.30%1.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UNWPX
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund
83.64%5.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.74%6.76%0.00%17.45%28.55%0.33%9.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNWPX and FEURX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UNWPX has higher volatility (14.31%) compared to FEURX (13.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNWPX dropped -83.78% vs FEURX's -36.99%.

UNWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNWPX and FEURX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer