UNWPX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
UNWPX is managed by U.S. Global Investors. It was launched on Nov 26, 1985. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UNWPX or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between UNWPX and VOO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UNWPX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UNWPX:
0.59
VOO:
1.88
UNWPX:
0.99
VOO:
2.52
UNWPX:
1.11
VOO:
1.35
UNWPX:
0.18
VOO:
2.83
UNWPX:
1.92
VOO:
11.96
UNWPX:
8.00%
VOO:
2.00%
UNWPX:
26.03%
VOO:
12.70%
UNWPX:
-95.16%
VOO:
-33.99%
UNWPX:
-79.71%
VOO:
-3.91%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNWPX achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, UNWPX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -0.25%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.26% annualized return.
UNWPX
6.76%
3.27%
-3.07%
13.67%
-2.07%
-0.25%
VOO
-0.66%
-3.35%
3.78%
23.82%
13.79%
13.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNWPX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNWPX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UNWPX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UNWPX
VOO
UNWPX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UNWPX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
UNWPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.74% | 6.75% | 0.00% | 17.44% | 28.55% | 0.33% | 9.84% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
UNWPX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNWPX drawdown since its inception was -95.16%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNWPX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UNWPX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.56%. This indicates that UNWPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.