UNWPX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
UNWPX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Nov 26, 1985. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
UNWPX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UNWPX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | -41.34% | 136.32% | 2.07% | -16.18% | -32.95% | -13.88% | 70.83% | 22.59% | -31.49% | -3.82% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNWPX achieves a -41.34% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, UNWPX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 1.70%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.
UNWPX
- 1D
- -37.54%
- 1M
- -53.72%
- YTD
- -41.34%
- 6M
- -32.73%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- -6.38%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNWPX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNWPX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UNWPX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
UNWPX
VOO
UNWPX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNWPX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 1.01 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.64 | 1.53 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 1.55 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | 7.31 | -5.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNWPX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 1.01 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.71 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.79 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.83 | -0.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between UNWPX and VOO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UNWPX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
UNWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.15%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 10.15% | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.74% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 17.45% | 28.55% | 0.33% | 9.84% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
UNWPX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNWPX drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNWPX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNWPX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.78% | -33.99% | -49.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.72% | -11.98% | -41.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.16% | -24.52% | -39.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -33.99% | -35.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.94% | -5.55% | -61.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.57% | -3.72% | -45.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 2.55% | +5.37% |
Volatility
UNWPX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a higher volatility of 47.77% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that UNWPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UNWPX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 47.77% | 5.34% | +42.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.55% | 9.47% | +48.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.52% | 18.11% | +36.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.32% | 16.82% | +17.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 17.99% | +14.30% |