UNWPX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
UNWPX is managed by U.S. Global Investors. It was launched on Nov 26, 1985. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UNWPX or VOO.
Key characteristics
| UNWPX | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.41% | 20.99% |
| 1Y Return | 10.88% | 31.67% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -12.38% | 11.17% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.22% | 15.70% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -1.19% | 13.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.52 | 2.39 |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.23% | 12.74% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.11% | -33.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -73.74% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNWPX and VOO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UNWPX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UNWPX achieves a 12.41% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 20.99% return. Over the past 10 years, UNWPX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -1.19%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNWPX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNWPX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UNWPX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UNWPX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
UNWPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.74% | 6.75% | 0.00% | 17.45% | 28.55% | 0.33% | 9.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.26% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
UNWPX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNWPX drawdown since its inception was -95.11%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNWPX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UNWPX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a higher volatility of 8.91% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.19%. This indicates that UNWPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.