PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNOV vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNOV vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNOV achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return.


UNOV

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.17%
YTD
5.40%
6M
5.64%
1Y
13.88%
3Y*
10.20%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*

SPTM

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.87%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.13%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNOV vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
5.40%9.92%9.42%14.18%-6.23%4.45%8.31%1.87%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
11.10%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between UNOV and SPTM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019

0.84

The correlation between UNOV and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

UNOV vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UNOV
SPTM

Technology

36.2%
34.0%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.1%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.6%

Industrials

8.1%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

UNOV
36.2%
SPTM
34.0%

Financial Services

UNOV
11.9%
SPTM
12.1%

Communication Services

UNOV
10.9%
SPTM
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UNOV
10.1%
SPTM
10.3%

Healthcare

UNOV
8.4%
SPTM
8.6%

Industrials

UNOV
8.1%
SPTM
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

UNOV
4.9%
SPTM
4.8%

Energy

UNOV
3.5%
SPTM
3.7%

Utilities

UNOV
2.3%
SPTM
2.3%

Real Estate

UNOV
1.9%
SPTM
2.3%

Basic Materials

UNOV
1.8%
SPTM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNOV vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNOV
UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNOV vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UNOVSPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.43

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.22

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.01

15.01

0.00

UNOV vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNOV and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNOVSPTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.36

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.80

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.46

+0.46

Drawdowns

UNOV vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNOV drawdown since its inception was -13.84%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNOV and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNOVSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-54.80%

+40.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

-8.68%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-18.87%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

-24.14%

+15.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.67%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-9.05%

+7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.86%

-0.93%

Volatility

UNOV vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) is 1.14%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that UNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNOVSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

2.88%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.67%

8.92%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.58%

11.88%

-6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

16.87%

-10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.72%

18.03%

-10.31%

UNOV vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNOV vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, UNOV and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPTM has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to UNOV (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNOV dropped -13.84% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 13.38% vs 6.68% for UNOV. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.

UNOV tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UNOV and 0.03% for SPTM.

UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNOV and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer