HCMT vs. SPXL
HCMT (Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCMT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while SPXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. HCMT is actively managed, while SPXL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HCMT returned 18.91%/yr vs 46.39%/yr for SPXL. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HCMT charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.
Performance
HCMT vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCMT achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than SPXL's 17.21% return.
HCMT
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 32.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- 62.56%
- 3Y*
- 46.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.70%
- 10Y*
- 30.27%
HCMT vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 4.79% | 7.39% | 39.14% | 6.45% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 17.21% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 22.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCMT and SPXL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between HCMT and SPXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
HCMT vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HCMT
SPXL
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HCMT
SPXL
Financial Services
HCMT
SPXL
Communication Services
HCMT
SPXL
Consumer Cyclical
HCMT
SPXL
Healthcare
HCMT
SPXL
Industrials
HCMT
SPXL
Consumer Defensive
HCMT
SPXL
Energy
HCMT
SPXL
Utilities
HCMT
SPXL
Real Estate
HCMT
SPXL
Basic Materials
HCMT
SPXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCMT vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank
HCMT
SPXL
HCMT vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HCMT | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 2.35 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 9.57 | -4.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HCMT vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCMT drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum SPXL drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMT and SPXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCMT | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -76.86% | +40.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.27% | -26.77% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.26% | -48.95% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.58% | -10.44% | +3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -16.09% | +7.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 6.56% | -0.41% |
Volatility
HCMT vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) is 12.47%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that HCMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCMT | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.47% | 14.70% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.67% | 29.55% | -9.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 37.43% | -10.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 50.54% | -21.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 53.47% | -24.46% |
HCMT vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCMT has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCMT vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison
HCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than SPXL's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 0.40% | 0.43% | 2.75% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, HCMT and SPXL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPXL has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to HCMT (12.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMT dropped -36.26% vs SPXL's -76.86%.
On 3-year performance, SPXL leads with 46.39% vs 18.91% for HCMT. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, HCMT has been the lower-risk option at 12.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 46.39% return vs 18.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for HCMT.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.40% for HCMT.
HCMT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPXL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for HCMT and 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCMT and SPXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer