HCMT vs. VOO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HCMT (Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCMT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. HCMT is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HCMT returned 14.07%/yr vs 19.42%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HCMT charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

HCMT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMT achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return.

HCMT

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -2.68%
• 6M: -0.37%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.57%

VOO

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 8.58%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 1Y: 21.58%
• 3Y*: 19.42%
• 5Y*: 12.83%
• 10Y*: 15.14%
• ALL TIME*: 14.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF	$1.31M	$1.90M	$1.82M
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	$3.82B	$3.78B	$5.44B

HCMT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF	1.23%	7.39%	39.14%	6.45%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.16%	17.82%	24.98%	10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between HCMT and VOO is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.92

The correlation between HCMT and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

HCMT vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HCMT	VOO
Technology	14.9%	38.6%
Financial Services	4.8%	11.4%
Communication Services	3.6%	9.9%
Healthcare	3.6%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	9.5%
Industrials	3.1%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	4.5%
Energy	1.3%	3.0%
Utilities	1.1%	2.2%
Real Estate	0.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	0.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

HCMT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HCMT

HCMT Risk / Return Rank: 26
HCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
HCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
HCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
HCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
HCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 27

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 68
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HCMT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HCMT	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	1.53	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	2.13	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.28	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	2.21	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.28	9.44	-7.15

HCMT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMT and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HCMT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMT drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMT and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCMT	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.26%	-33.99%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.58%	-8.90%	-6.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.26%	-18.69%	-17.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.75%	-1.38%	-8.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-3.67%	-4.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.71%	2.08%	+4.63%

Volatility

HCMT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that HCMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCMT	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.49%	3.54%	+6.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.76%	10.10%	+11.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.43%	12.82%	+15.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.28%	16.93%	+12.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.28%	18.01%	+11.27%

HCMT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMT has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

HCMT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

HCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VOO's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF	0.61%	0.43%	2.75%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.07%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCMT and VOO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, HCMT and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HCMT or VOO?

HCMT has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMT dropped -36.26% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which ETF is better, HCMT or VOO?

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 19.42% vs 14.07% for HCMT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HCMT or VOO?

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 19.42% return vs 14.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HCMT or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for HCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HCMT or VOO?

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.61% for HCMT.

What is the main difference between HCMT and VOO?

HCMT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for HCMT and 0.03% for VOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.