HCMT vs. HCMPX
HCMT (Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF) and HCMPX (HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund) are both funds - HCMT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while HCMPX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Howard Capital Management. Over the past 3 years, HCMT returned 18.91%/yr vs 23.00%/yr for HCMPX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HCMT charges 1.17%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for HCMPX.
Performance
HCMT vs. HCMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCMT achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than HCMPX's 5.40% return.
HCMT
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 32.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCMPX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 23.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
HCMT vs. HCMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 4.79% | 7.39% | 39.14% | 6.45% |
HCMPX HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund | 5.40% | 15.92% | 43.56% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCMT and HCMPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between HCMT and HCMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCMT vs. HCMPX — Risk / Return Rank
HCMT
HCMPX
HCMT vs. HCMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HCMT | HCMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 2.69 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 8.70 | -3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HCMT vs. HCMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCMT drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than HCMPX's maximum drawdown of -28.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMT and HCMPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCMT | HCMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -28.88% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.27% | -10.42% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.26% | -18.43% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.58% | -2.43% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -7.94% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 3.22% | +2.93% |
Volatility
HCMT vs. HCMPX - Volatility Comparison
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) has a higher volatility of 12.47% compared to HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX) at 6.64%. This indicates that HCMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCMT | HCMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.47% | 6.64% | +5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.67% | 12.52% | +7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 17.65% | +8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 19.63% | +9.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 20.22% | +8.79% |
HCMT vs. HCMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCMT has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than HCMPX's 2.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCMT vs. HCMPX - Dividend Comparison
HCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than HCMPX's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMPX HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund | 0.41% | 0.43% | 29.52% | 5.15% | 8.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 12.87% | 8.64% | 4.18% | 2.18% |
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 0.40% | 0.43% | 2.75% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, HCMT and HCMPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HCMT has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to HCMPX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMT dropped -36.26% vs HCMPX's -28.88%.
HCMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCMT and HCMPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer