UNG vs. SDCI
UNG (United States Natural Gas Fund LP) and SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UNG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Natural Gas Futures, while SDCI is a Commodities fund tracking the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UNG returned -24.87%/yr vs 19.28%/yr for SDCI. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNG charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SDCI.
Performance
UNG vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -6.20% return, which is significantly lower than SDCI's 19.77% return.
UNG
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- -6.20%
- 6M
- -10.85%
- 1Y
- -31.71%
- 3Y*
- -27.52%
- 5Y*
- -24.87%
- 10Y*
- -21.37%
SDCI
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 19.77%
- 6M
- 17.11%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- —
UNG vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -6.20% | -27.07% | -17.11% | -64.04% | 12.89% | 35.76% | -45.43% | -31.77% | 9.92% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 19.77% | 17.60% | 17.91% | -0.88% | 33.23% | 36.52% | -10.61% | -2.36% | -13.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNG and SDCI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2018 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNG vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank
UNG
SDCI
UNG vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNG | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.26 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 2.54 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 8.69 | -9.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNG vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than SDCI's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and SDCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNG | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.88% | -45.79% | -54.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -9.92% | -30.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.16% | -11.96% | -56.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.49% | -18.55% | -73.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.86% | -9.92% | -89.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.97% | -11.55% | -78.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.12% | 2.90% | +23.22% |
Volatility
UNG vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison
United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) at 3.14%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNG | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.10% | 3.14% | +8.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.87% | 14.30% | +36.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.39% | 16.91% | +43.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.14% | 18.37% | +45.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.80% | 17.05% | +37.75% |
UNG vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNG has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SDCI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNG vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison
UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 3.07% | 3.68% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 33.49% | 19.26% | 0.20% | 0.93% | 0.68% |
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNG and SDCI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNG has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to SDCI (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNG dropped -99.88% vs SDCI's -45.79%.
On 5-year performance, SDCI leads with 19.28% vs -24.87% for UNG. On fees, SDCI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SDCI has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 19.28% return vs -24.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDCI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for UNG.
SDCI has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.00% for UNG.
UNG is categorized as Oil & Gas, while SDCI is Commodities. UNG tracks Front Month Natural Gas Futures, while SDCI tracks SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for UNG and 0.60% for SDCI.
SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNG and SDCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer