PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNG vs. BXSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNG vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -7.42% return, which is significantly lower than BXSL's -6.39% return.


UNG

1D
1.70%
1M
1.70%
YTD
-7.42%
6M
-10.84%
1Y
-30.62%
3Y*
-23.83%
5Y*
-24.47%
10Y*
-21.38%

BXSL

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
-6.39%
6M
-9.95%
1Y
-15.35%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNG vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
-7.42%-27.07%-17.11%-64.04%12.89%-38.92%
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
-6.39%-9.36%29.02%37.82%-26.03%32.04%

Correlation

The correlation between UNG and BXSL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.02

The correlation between UNG and BXSL shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNG vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNG
UNG Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
UNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
UNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNG Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BXSL
BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNG vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UNGBXSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.88

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

-0.68

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

-1.01

+0.04

UNG vs. BXSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is higher than the BXSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNG and BXSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNG vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than BXSL's maximum drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and BXSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNGBXSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.88%

-36.80%

-63.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.86%

-23.47%

-20.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.16%

-24.21%

-43.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.86%

-20.54%

-79.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.96%

-14.15%

-75.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.28%

15.73%

+14.55%

Volatility

UNG vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison

United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 12.64% compared to Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) at 5.42%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNGBXSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.64%

5.42%

+7.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.01%

16.42%

+35.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.61%

20.20%

+40.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.11%

23.85%

+40.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.77%

23.85%

+30.92%

Dividends

UNG vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison

UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
12.91%11.70%9.53%10.64%13.02%1.56%
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNG and BXSL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UNG has higher volatility (12.64%) compared to BXSL (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNG dropped -99.88% vs BXSL's -36.80%.

UNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.49 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNG and BXSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer