BXSL vs. SCHD
BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 3 years, BXSL returned 4.19%/yr vs 14.19%/yr for SCHD. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BXSL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BXSL achieves a -6.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return.
BXSL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- 6M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -6.41%
- 1Y
- -16.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.49%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.14M | $38.04M | $43.29M | |
| $786.88M | $715.86M | $685.58M |
BXSL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | -6.41% | -9.36% | 29.02% | 37.82% | -26.03% | 32.04% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 24.03% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BXSL and SCHD is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BXSL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
BXSL
SCHD
BXSL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BXSL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.51 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 6.74 | -7.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 17.01 | -18.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BXSL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BXSL drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXSL and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BXSL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.80% | -33.37% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.13% | -4.61% | -15.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.21% | -16.13% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.55% | -1.24% | -19.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -3.30% | -11.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.69% | 1.82% | +12.87% |
Volatility
BXSL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 4.11%. This indicates that BXSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BXSL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 4.11% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 8.11% | +8.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.75% | 11.13% | +9.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 14.39% | +9.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 16.72% | +6.99% |
Dividends
BXSL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.33%, more than SCHD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 13.33% | 11.70% | 9.53% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.13% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BXSL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXSL has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to SCHD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXSL dropped -36.80% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BXSL and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer