PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BXSL vs. BXMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BXSL vs. BXMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BXSL achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than BXMT's -1.89% return.


BXSL

1D
-0.63%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
-6.78%
6M
-7.95%
1Y
-15.84%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
10Y*

BXMT

1D
2.12%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
-1.89%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
8.78%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
-1.37%
10Y*
4.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BXSL vs. BXMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
-6.78%-9.36%29.02%37.82%-26.03%24.96%
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
-1.89%21.13%-7.90%13.46%-24.03%-5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BXSL and BXMT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BXSL:

$5.51B

BXMT:

$3.10B

EPS

BXSL:

$1.80

BXMT:

$0.61

PE Ratio

BXSL:

13.21

BXMT:

30.20

PS Ratio

BXSL:

7.73

BXMT:

2.04

PB Ratio

BXSL:

0.90

BXMT:

0.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

BXSL:

$706.98M

BXMT:

$1.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BXSL:

$831.73M

BXMT:

$960.53M

EBITDA (TTM)

BXSL:

$525.53M

BXMT:

$957.49M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BXSL vs. BXMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BXSL
BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BXMT
BXMT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BXMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BXMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BXSL vs. BXMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BXSLBXMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.80

0.41

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.10

0.71

-1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.09

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

0.58

-1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.07

1.38

-2.45

BXSL vs. BXMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BXSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the BXMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BXSL and BXMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BXSLBXMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

0.41

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.08

+0.24

Drawdowns

BXSL vs. BXMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BXSL drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum BXMT drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXSL and BXMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BXSLBXMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-97.98%

+61.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.47%

-12.02%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.21%

-23.29%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.87%

-34.14%

+13.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.11%

-49.07%

+34.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.31%

5.03%

+10.28%

Volatility

BXSL vs. BXMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) is 4.73%, while Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that BXSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BXSLBXMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

7.19%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.12%

16.36%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.81%

21.50%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.72%

27.71%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.72%

32.61%

-8.89%

Dividends

BXSL vs. BXMT - Dividend Comparison

BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.97%, more than BXMT's 10.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
10.27%9.83%12.52%11.66%11.71%8.10%9.01%6.66%7.78%7.71%8.25%8.52%
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
12.97%11.70%9.53%10.64%13.02%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BXSL vs. BXMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M202220232024202520260
380.15M
(BXSL) Total Revenue
(BXMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BXSL and BXMT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BXMT has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to BXSL (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXSL dropped -36.80% vs BXMT's -97.98%.

BXMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BXSL and BXMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer