UMDD vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
UMDD and FNGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UMDD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. Both UMDD and FNGU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UMDD vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UMDD vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 5.14% | -5.94% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | -35.43% | 4.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's -35.43% return.
UMDD
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -17.06%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 28.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
FNGU
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -14.02%
- YTD
- -35.43%
- 6M
- -44.05%
- 1Y
- 17.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMDD vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UMDD and FNGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
UMDD vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank
UMDD
FNGU
UMDD vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UMDD | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 0.23 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 0.92 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.12 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.38 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 1.00 | +1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMDD | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.23 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | -0.37 | +0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between UMDD and FNGU is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UMDD vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.76% | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.64% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.06% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UMDD vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and FNGU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMDD | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.24% | -60.84% | -25.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.30% | -59.55% | +21.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.99% | -51.94% | +23.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.71% | -21.87% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.66% | 22.51% | -11.85% |
Volatility
UMDD vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) is 19.56%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 24.03%. This indicates that UMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UMDD | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.56% | 24.03% | -4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.08% | 44.97% | -8.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.30% | 77.71% | -14.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.88% | 80.80% | -21.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.19% | 80.80% | -18.61% |