UMAC vs. VOO
UMAC (Unusual Machines, Inc) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past year, UMAC returned 138.34% vs 22.23% for VOO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UMAC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMAC achieves a 53.22% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.08% return.
UMAC
- 1D
- -9.25%
- 1M
- 16.33%
- YTD
- 53.22%
- 6M
- 49.35%
- 1Y
- 138.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.60%
UMAC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc | 53.22% | -24.26% | 320.50% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.08% | 17.82% | 20.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMAC and VOO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMAC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
UMAC
VOO
UMAC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMAC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.51 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 11.16 | -5.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMAC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMAC drawdown since its inception was -75.61%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAC and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMAC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.61% | -33.99% | -41.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.63% | -8.90% | -43.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.59% | -3.23% | -38.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.95% | -3.68% | -42.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.20% | 2.00% | +24.20% |
Volatility
UMAC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) has a higher volatility of 62.12% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.80%. This indicates that UMAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMAC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 62.12% | 4.80% | +57.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 100.42% | 9.79% | +90.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.36% | 12.43% | +120.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 164.18% | 16.91% | +147.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 164.18% | 18.02% | +146.16% |
Dividends
UMAC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
UMAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMAC and VOO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMAC has higher volatility (62.12%) compared to VOO (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMAC dropped -75.61% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMAC and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer