UMAC vs. RCAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) and Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT).

Performance

UMAC vs. RCAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) and Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UMAC vs. RCAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc	-2.67%	-24.26%	455.12%
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc.	65.07%	-38.29%	1,726.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap UMAC : $322.59M RCAT : $1.56B
EPS UMAC : -$0.73 RCAT : -$0.71
PS Ratio UMAC : 28.92 RCAT : 32.62
PB Ratio UMAC : 1.84 RCAT : 6.36
Total Revenue (TTM) UMAC : $11.20M RCAT : $40.73M
Gross Profit (TTM) UMAC : $3.91M RCAT : $1.28M
EBITDA (TTM) UMAC : -$19.09M RCAT : -$60.91M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAC achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than RCAT's 65.07% return.

UMAC

• 1D: 11.71%
• 1M: -9.16%
• YTD: -2.67%
• 6M: -17.88%
• 1Y: 93.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RCAT

• 1D: 12.94%
• 1M: 12.36%
• YTD: 65.07%
• 6M: 26.47%
• 1Y: 122.62%
• 3Y*: 132.61%
• 5Y*: 25.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

UMAC vs. RCAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMAC

UMAC Risk / Return Rank: 72
UMAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UMAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
UMAC Omega Ratio Rank: 70
UMAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
UMAC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

RCAT

RCAT Risk / Return Rank: 77
RCAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
RCAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RCAT Omega Ratio Rank: 74
RCAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RCAT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAC vs. RCAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) and Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMAC	RCAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.03	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	2.03	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.23	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	2.03	-0.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	4.43	-0.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMAC vs. RCAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the RCAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAC and RCAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMAC	RCAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	1.03	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	-0.06	+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between UMAC and RCAT is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

UMAC vs. RCAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither UMAC nor RCAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UMAC vs. RCAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAC drawdown since its inception was -75.61%, smaller than the maximum RCAT drawdown of -99.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAC and RCAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMAC	RCAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.61%	-99.76%	+24.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.63%	-60.08%	+7.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-92.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.02%	-92.15%	+48.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.48%	-95.58%	+50.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.51%	27.61%	-4.10%

Volatility

UMAC vs. RCAT - Volatility Comparison

Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) has a higher volatility of 42.59% compared to Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) at 37.54%. This indicates that UMAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMAC	RCAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	42.59%	37.54%	+5.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	87.03%	84.17%	+2.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	125.40%	120.21%	+5.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	162.99%	114.24%	+48.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	162.99%	251.41%	-88.42%

Financials