UMAC vs. SERV
UMAC (Unusual Machines, Inc) and SERV (Serve Robotics Inc) are both stocks. UMAC operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while SERV operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past year, UMAC returned 139.37% vs -52.25% for SERV. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UMAC vs. SERV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMAC achieves a 66.09% return, which is significantly higher than SERV's -53.95% return.
UMAC
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- 6M
- 52.78%
- YTD
- 66.09%
- 1Y
- 139.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 96.90%
SERV
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -24.25%
- 6M
- -54.17%
- YTD
- -53.95%
- 1Y
- -52.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -37.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.65M | $15.63M | $34.12M | |
| $64.72M | $66.46M | $135.77M |
UMAC vs. SERV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc | 66.09% | -24.26% | 544.44% |
SERV Serve Robotics Inc | -53.95% | -23.11% | -10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMAC and SERV is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, UMAC and SERV have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
UMAC:
$713.02M
SERV:
$318.36M
UMAC:
-$0.16
SERV:
-$1.98
UMAC:
42.82
SERV:
63.68
UMAC:
3.07
SERV:
1.13
UMAC:
$17.25M
SERV:
$5.19M
UMAC:
$5.92M
SERV:
-$22.91M
UMAC:
-$28.96M
SERV:
-$138.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMAC vs. SERV — Risk / Return Rank
UMAC
SERV
UMAC vs. SERV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) and Serve Robotics Inc (SERV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMAC | SERV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.93 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | -0.71 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.53 | -1.25 | +5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMAC vs. SERV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMAC drawdown since its inception was -75.61%, smaller than the maximum SERV drawdown of -92.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAC and SERV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMAC | SERV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.61% | -92.72% | +17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.63% | -75.28% | +22.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.68% | -80.88% | +44.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -62.53% | +16.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.60% | 42.53% | -13.93% |
Volatility
UMAC vs. SERV - Volatility Comparison
Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) has a higher volatility of 37.62% compared to Serve Robotics Inc (SERV) at 18.88%. This indicates that UMAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SERV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMAC | SERV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.62% | 18.88% | +18.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.13% | 52.29% | +48.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 130.32% | 88.02% | +42.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 162.77% | 189.41% | -26.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 162.77% | 189.41% | -26.64% |
Dividends
UMAC vs. SERV - Dividend Comparison
Neither UMAC nor SERV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
UMAC vs. SERV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unusual Machines, Inc and Serve Robotics Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UMAC and SERV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMAC has higher volatility (37.62%) compared to SERV (18.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMAC dropped -75.61% vs SERV's -92.72%.
UMAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMAC and SERV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer