ULVM vs. SMOM
ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ULVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. ULVM is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
ULVM vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 9.52% return.
ULVM
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ULVM vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.99% | 4.18% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.52% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVM and SMOM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVM vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
ULVM
SMOM
ULVM vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.42 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
ULVM vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -7.45% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -1.48% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | — | — |
Volatility
ULVM vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 12.65% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 12.65% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 12.65% | +6.21% |
ULVM vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULVM vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULVM and SMOM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
ULVM is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for ULVM and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer