PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ULVM vs. MFVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ULVM vs. MFVL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL).

ULVM and MFVL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ULVM is a passively managed fund by Victory Capital that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2017. MFVL is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025.

Performance

ULVM vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ULVM vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF		4.86%0.55%
MFVL
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF		-1.60%1.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's -1.60% return.

ULVM

1D
1.99%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
4.86%
6M
6.43%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
—

MFVL

1D
1.37%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF

Motley Fool Value Factor ETF

Often compared with ULVM:
ULVM vs. SEIVULVM vs. SPMOULVM vs. SPYULVM vs. FXAIXULVM vs. USVMULVM vs. JPUSULVM vs. ONEV
Often compared with MFVL:
MFVL vs. ELCVMFVL vs. MFIGMFVL vs. VTVMFVL vs. HDVMFVL vs. CENXMFVL vs. HIDVMFVL vs. SCHV

ULVM vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.

MFVL
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF

Return for Risk

ULVM vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
MFVL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULVM vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ULVMMFVLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

—

—

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

—

—

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

—

—

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

—

—

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.58

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ULVM vs. MFVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ULVMMFVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

-0.07

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between ULVM and MFVL is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ULVM vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF		1.72%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%
MFVL
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ULVM vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and MFVL.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ULVMMFVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-6.49%

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.72%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.77%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.41%

-5.21%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-1.41%

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

—

—

Volatility

ULVM vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ULVMMFVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.24%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

11.67%

+5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.54%

11.67%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.99%

11.67%

+7.32%