MFVL vs. HIDV
MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HIDV.
Performance
MFVL vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than HIDV's 10.96% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIDV
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 10.96% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and HIDV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
HIDV
MFVL vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFVL | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.62 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum HIDV drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and HIDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -18.76% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -0.95% | -2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -2.05% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.19% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 11.91% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 14.52% | -2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 14.52% | -2.37% |
MFVL vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFVL vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison
MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.27% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFVL and HIDV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.
HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.45% for HIDV.
Find the right allocation for MFVL and HIDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer