ULVM vs. FNCMX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) are both funds - ULVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while FNCMX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ULVM returned 12.69%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for FNCMX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FNCMX.

Performance

ULVM vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 18.66% return, which is significantly higher than FNCMX's 13.43% return.

ULVM

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 1.39%
• 6M: 15.03%
• YTD: 18.66%
• 1Y: 28.23%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 12.69%
• 10Y*: —

FNCMX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.58%
• 6M: 11.08%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 1Y: 28.42%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULVM vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF	18.66%	15.84%	19.76%	10.16%	-9.04%	31.06%	3.51%	22.08%	-12.07%	4.11%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	13.43%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	36.63%	-3.07%	4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ULVM and FNCMX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between ULVM and FNCMX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ULVM vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULVM

ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 92
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 48
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULVM vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ULVM	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	1.59	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	2.18	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.28	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.38	2.17	+2.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.10	7.89	+10.21

ULVM vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULVM and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ULVM vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and FNCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ULVM	FNCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.71%	-55.08%	+14.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-13.01%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.14%	-24.20%	+6.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.77%	-35.64%	+15.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.90%	+2.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-7.84%	+2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	3.58%	-2.02%

Volatility

ULVM vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is 2.84%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that ULVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ULVM	FNCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	6.92%	-4.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.10%	14.17%	-6.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.83%	17.73%	-6.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.43%	22.71%	-7.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.77%	22.09%	-3.32%

ULVM vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

ULVM vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than FNCMX's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.45%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF	1.63%	1.81%	1.57%	1.94%	1.91%	1.36%	1.51%	1.88%	1.67%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ULVM and FNCMX in my portfolio?

ULVM and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ULVM or FNCMX?

FNCMX has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to ULVM (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.