FNCMX vs. VUG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG).
FNCMX is managed by Fidelity. VUG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2000.
Performance
FNCMX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNCMX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | -10.43% | 21.11% | 29.48% | 45.13% | -32.40% | 22.21% | 44.57% | 36.63% | -3.07% | 28.35% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | -10.37% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FNCMX having a -10.43% return and VUG slightly higher at -10.37%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNCMX having a 16.42% annualized return and VUG not far behind at 16.03%.
FNCMX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -10.43%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.42%
VUG
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- 18.30%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNCMX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNCMX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNCMX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
FNCMX
VUG
FNCMX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNCMX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.81 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 1.31 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.11 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 3.96 | +0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNCMX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.81 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.57 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNCMX and VUG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNCMX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
FNCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than VUG's 0.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | 0.57% | 0.51% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.47% | 0.67% | 4.41% | 1.93% | 0.03% | 1.01% | 1.50% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Drawdowns
FNCMX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNCMX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCMX and VUG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNCMX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.08% | -50.68% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.25% | -16.53% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.64% | -35.61% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.64% | -35.61% | -0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.01% | -13.20% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -7.13% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 4.66% | -1.10% |
Volatility
FNCMX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) is 5.63%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that FNCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNCMX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 7.00% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 12.65% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.06% | 22.68% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 22.23% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 21.38% | +0.59% |