FNCMX vs. VUG

In the year-to-date period, FNCMX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 1.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNCMX having a 14.63% annualized return and VUG not far ahead at 15.24%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FNCMX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.04% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FNCMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCMX and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FNCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than VUG's 0.47% yield.

The maximum FNCMX drawdown since its inception was -55.71%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCMX and VUG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 6.89% and 6.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.