PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FNCMX vs. VUG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNCMX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

750.00%800.00%850.00%900.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
875.57%
904.20%
FNCMX
VUG

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCMX achieves a 25.14% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 28.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNCMX having a 15.21% annualized return and VUG not far ahead at 15.45%.


FNCMX

YTD

25.14%

1M

1.74%

6M

12.29%

1Y

33.21%

5Y (annualized)

17.15%

10Y (annualized)

15.21%

VUG

YTD

28.45%

1M

2.21%

6M

13.73%

1Y

35.45%

5Y (annualized)

18.64%

10Y (annualized)

15.45%

Key characteristics


FNCMXVUG
Sharpe Ratio1.902.14
Sortino Ratio2.512.80
Omega Ratio1.341.39
Calmar Ratio2.542.78
Martin Ratio9.5310.98
Ulcer Index3.49%3.28%
Daily Std Dev17.52%16.84%
Max Drawdown-55.71%-50.68%
Current Drawdown-3.19%-2.68%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNCMX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCMX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.04% expense ratio.


FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
Expense ratio chart for FNCMX: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%
Expense ratio chart for VUG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between FNCMX and VUG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNCMX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNCMX, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.902.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNCMX, currently valued at 2.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.512.80
The chart of Omega ratio for FNCMX, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.341.39
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNCMX, currently valued at 2.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.002.542.78
The chart of Martin ratio for FNCMX, currently valued at 9.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.5310.98
FNCMX
VUG

The current FNCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCMX and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.90
2.14
FNCMX
VUG

Dividends

FNCMX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

FNCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than VUG's 0.49% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
0.53%0.67%0.88%0.47%0.67%0.97%0.94%0.70%0.91%0.89%0.80%0.72%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.49%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%1.21%1.19%

Drawdowns

FNCMX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCMX drawdown since its inception was -55.71%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCMX and VUG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.19%
-2.68%
FNCMX
VUG

Volatility

FNCMX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.49%. This indicates that FNCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.77%
5.49%
FNCMX
VUG