FNCMX vs. SWLGX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).

FNCMX is managed by Fidelity. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.

Performance

FNCMX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNCMX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	-10.43%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	36.63%	-3.07%	-1.57%
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	-13.06%	18.55%	33.30%	42.67%	-29.17%	27.55%	38.43%	36.30%	-1.59%	-0.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCMX achieves a -10.43% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.

FNCMX

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -8.22%
• YTD: -10.43%
• 6M: -8.01%
• 1Y: 20.91%
• 3Y*: 20.31%
• 5Y*: 10.35%
• 10Y*: 16.42%

SWLGX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -8.63%
• YTD: -13.06%
• 6M: -12.07%
• 1Y: 14.45%
• 3Y*: 19.67%
• 5Y*: 11.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCMX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCMX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

FNCMX

Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund

SWLGX

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund

Return for Risk

FNCMX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 53
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

SWLGX

SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 28
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCMX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNCMX	SWLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	0.66	+0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	1.10	+0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.15	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	0.72	+0.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.92	2.51	+2.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNCMX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCMX and SWLGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNCMX	SWLGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	0.66	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.56	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.68	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between FNCMX and SWLGX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FNCMX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

FNCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.57%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	0.52%	0.46%	0.52%	0.67%	0.93%	1.76%	0.67%	0.96%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FNCMX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCMX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCMX and SWLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNCMX	SWLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.08%	-32.69%	-22.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.25%	-16.16%	+2.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.64%	-32.69%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.01%	-16.16%	+3.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-7.13%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	4.62%	-1.06%

Volatility

FNCMX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNCMX	SWLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	5.38%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.48%	11.82%	+0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.06%	22.31%	+0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.42%	21.47%	+0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.97%	22.78%	-0.81%