PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULVM vs. ABEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ULVM vs. ABEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ULVM vs. ABEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
5.70%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%1.93%
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
5.41%15.32%12.68%4.63%-1.00%12.49%2.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than ABEQ's 5.41% return.


ULVM

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.53%
YTD
5.70%
6M
7.77%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*

ABEQ

1D
0.11%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
5.41%
6M
5.95%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ULVM vs. ABEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ULVM vs. ABEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ABEQ
ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULVM vs. ABEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULVMABEQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.08

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

1.52

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.55

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.44

5.76

+2.68

ULVM vs. ABEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the ABEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULVM and ABEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULVMABEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.08

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.83

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.59

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between ULVM and ABEQ is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ULVM vs. ABEQ - Dividend Comparison

ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than ABEQ's 1.18% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.71%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
1.18%1.25%1.48%2.60%1.20%0.60%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ULVM vs. ABEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than ABEQ's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and ABEQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ULVMABEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-27.82%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.72%

-7.95%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.77%

-17.26%

-2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-5.67%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-4.02%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.14%

+0.48%

Volatility

ULVM vs. ABEQ - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) at 2.46%. This indicates that ULVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ULVMABEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

2.46%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

7.09%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.71%

11.59%

+5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.54%

10.86%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

13.98%

+5.00%