ULTI vs. XLII
ULTI (REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF) and XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ULTI charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLII.
Performance
ULTI vs. XLII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULTI achieves a -12.35% return, which is significantly lower than XLII's 14.99% return.
ULTI
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -18.69%
- 6M
- -23.16%
- YTD
- -12.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XLII
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 22.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $651.44K | $766.06K | $1.11M | |
| $471.77K | $333.33K | $221.09K |
ULTI vs. XLII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | -12.35% | -38.67% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.99% | 2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULTI and XLII is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULTI vs. XLII — Risk / Return Rank
ULTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLII
ULTI vs. XLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF (ULTI) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ULTI | XLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ULTI vs. XLII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULTI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, which is greater than XLII's maximum drawdown of -10.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTI and XLII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULTI | XLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.23% | -10.10% | -44.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.25% | 0.00% | -46.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.84% | -1.27% | -28.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.24% | — |
Volatility
ULTI vs. XLII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULTI | XLII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.64% | 12.33% | +49.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.64% | 12.32% | +49.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.64% | 12.32% | +49.32% |
ULTI vs. XLII - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULTI has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLII's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULTI vs. XLII - Dividend Comparison
ULTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.80%, more than XLII's 13.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | 94.80% | 14.96% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.03% | 5.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULTI and XLII have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ULTI.
ULTI has the higher dividend yield at 94.80%, compared with 13.03% for XLII.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for ULTI and 0.35% for XLII.
Find the right allocation for ULTI and XLII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer