ULTI vs. DDDD
ULTI (REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF) and DDDD (YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ULTI charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for DDDD.
Performance
ULTI vs. DDDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ULTI
- 1D
- -3.05%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- 43.46%
- 6M
- 22.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDDD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ULTI vs. DDDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | 40.30% |
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF | 5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULTI and DDDD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULTI vs. DDDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF (ULTI) and YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULTI | DDDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | 2.55 | -2.85 |
Drawdowns
ULTI vs. DDDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULTI drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, which is greater than DDDD's maximum drawdown of -1.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTI and DDDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULTI | DDDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.74% | -1.88% | -39.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.50% | -1.22% | -10.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.13% | -0.60% | -27.53% |
Volatility
ULTI vs. DDDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULTI | DDDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.43% | 9.69% | +52.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.43% | 9.69% | +52.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.43% | 9.69% | +52.74% |
ULTI vs. DDDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULTI has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DDDD's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULTI vs. DDDD - Dividend Comparison
ULTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.53%, while DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | 42.53% | 14.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULTI and DDDD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDDD is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDDD is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ULTI.
ULTI has the higher dividend yield at 42.53%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for ULTI and 0.99% for DDDD.
Find the right allocation for ULTI and DDDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer