PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UL vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UL vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unilever PLC (UL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a -7.84% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 23.40% return. Over the past 10 years, UL has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 5.24%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 19.95% annualized return.


UL

1D
2.69%
1M
3.31%
YTD
-7.84%
6M
-8.30%
1Y
-12.67%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
5.24%

GRID

1D
-4.46%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
23.40%
6M
22.11%
1Y
42.41%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
19.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UL vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UL
Unilever PLC
-7.84%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.40%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between UL and GRID is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.33

The correlation between UL and GRID shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UL vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UL vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unilever PLC (UL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.35

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

3.63

-4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

12.92

-13.93

UL vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UL Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UL and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UL vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.55%

-40.56%

-12.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.09%

-11.73%

-13.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.09%

-20.77%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-29.64%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.13%

-40.56%

+10.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.19%

-5.55%

-13.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-8.42%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.50%

3.29%

+9.21%

Volatility

UL vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Unilever PLC (UL) is 6.90%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that UL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

10.12%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.99%

18.23%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.70%

21.26%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

21.37%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

22.80%

-1.29%

Dividends

UL vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
UL
Unilever PLC
3.85%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


UL and GRID have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to UL (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UL dropped -53.55% vs GRID's -40.56%.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UL and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer