PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIVM vs. ULVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIVM vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UIVM having a 19.77% return and ULVM slightly higher at 20.05%.


UIVM

1D
-0.46%
1M
5.17%
6M
12.63%
YTD
19.77%
1Y
34.82%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.47%

ULVM

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.85%
6M
15.22%
YTD
20.05%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$137.91K$192.35K$135.04K
$297.74K$260.49K$217.66K

UIVM vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
19.77%45.47%5.23%16.79%-13.31%11.85%0.76%15.29%-17.41%2.36%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
20.05%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between UIVM and ULVM is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.75

The correlation between UIVM and ULVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UIVM vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UIVM
ULVM

Financial Services

28.9%
27.0%

Industrials

22.1%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
4.7%

Healthcare

6.7%
11.2%

Energy

5.6%
4.7%

Basic Materials

5.4%
3.7%

Utilities

4.5%
10.4%

Real Estate

4.4%
7.1%

Communication Services

3.9%
3.1%

Technology

3.2%
9.1%

Financial Services

UIVM
28.9%
ULVM
27.0%

Industrials

UIVM
22.1%
ULVM
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

UIVM
7.8%
ULVM
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

UIVM
6.9%
ULVM
4.7%

Healthcare

UIVM
6.7%
ULVM
11.2%

Energy

UIVM
5.6%
ULVM
4.7%

Basic Materials

UIVM
5.4%
ULVM
3.7%

Utilities

UIVM
4.5%
ULVM
10.4%

Real Estate

UIVM
4.4%
ULVM
7.1%

Communication Services

UIVM
3.9%
ULVM
3.1%

Technology

UIVM
3.2%
ULVM
9.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIVM vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UIVM
UIVM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
UIVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
UIVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UIVM vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UIVMULVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.49

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

4.63

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

19.50

-8.04

UIVM vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIVM and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIVM vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, roughly equal to the maximum ULVM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and ULVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIVMULVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.73%

-40.71%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-6.47%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-18.14%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-19.77%

-8.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-1.26%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-5.65%

-3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.53%

+1.54%

Volatility

UIVM vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.72%. This indicates that UIVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIVMULVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

2.72%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

8.10%

+5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

10.81%

+4.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

15.39%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

18.73%

-1.51%

UIVM vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIVM vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than ULVM's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
3.06%3.70%5.09%4.35%3.03%3.48%1.63%3.49%2.78%0.15%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.62%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIVM and ULVM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UIVM has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to ULVM (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, UIVM leads with 13.33% vs 12.55% for ULVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UIVM has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UIVM.

UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 1.62% for ULVM.

UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.20% for ULVM.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIVM and ULVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer