UIVM vs. SMOM
UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UIVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. UIVM is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UIVM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
UIVM vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 9.52% return.
UIVM
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 19.97%
- 1Y
- 35.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIVM vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 15.98% | 6.31% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.52% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIVM and SMOM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIVM vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
UIVM
SMOM
UIVM vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.32 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.42 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
UIVM vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.73% | -7.45% | -35.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -1.48% | -8.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | — | — |
Volatility
UIVM vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 12.65% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 12.65% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 12.65% | +4.56% |
UIVM vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIVM vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 3.19% | 3.70% | 5.09% | 4.35% | 3.03% | 3.48% | 1.63% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIVM and SMOM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
UIVM is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for UIVM and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer