UIVM vs. FDT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UIVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIVM returned 11.91%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for FDT. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIVM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.

Performance

UIVM vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 24.89% return.

UIVM

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 15.18%
• 6M: 18.92%
• 1Y: 34.20%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: —

FDT

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 24.89%
• 6M: 27.78%
• 1Y: 53.72%
• 3Y*: 29.96%
• 5Y*: 12.44%
• 10Y*: 10.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIVM vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF	15.18%	45.47%	5.23%	16.79%	-13.31%	11.85%	0.76%	15.29%	-17.41%	2.56%
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	24.89%	52.21%	6.97%	15.03%	-19.51%	11.43%	4.29%	16.82%	-19.98%	4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between UIVM and FDT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017	0.93

The correlation between UIVM and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

UIVM vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UIVM	FDT
Financial Services	30.3%	10.2%
Industrials	21.4%	34.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	2.8%
Healthcare	5.7%	1.4%
Technology	5.7%	8.1%
Basic Materials	5.6%	9.6%
Utilities	4.9%	5.2%
Real Estate	4.7%	5.3%
Energy	4.3%	9.2%
Communication Services	3.1%	2.7%

Return for Risk

UIVM vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIVM

UIVM Risk / Return Rank: 70
UIVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
UIVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
UIVM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
UIVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
UIVM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FDT

FDT Risk / Return Rank: 84
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIVM vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UIVM	FDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.93	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	3.77	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.52	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	4.03	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.44	15.71	-4.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UIVM vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIVM and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UIVM	FDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.93	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.69	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.39	+0.08

Drawdowns

UIVM vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and FDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UIVM	FDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.73%	-46.10%	+3.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-13.41%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.69%	-14.29%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.27%	-33.18%	+4.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-2.07%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.70%	-10.77%	+1.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	3.43%	-0.43%

Volatility

UIVM vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) is 4.95%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that UIVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UIVM	FDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	7.03%	-2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.45%	15.93%	-3.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.55%	18.42%	-3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.45%	18.23%	-2.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	18.52%	-1.32%

UIVM vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

UIVM vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than FDT's 2.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	2.85%	3.27%	3.89%	4.36%	2.29%	3.80%	2.42%	2.78%	2.13%	1.57%	1.76%	1.83%
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF	3.21%	3.70%	5.09%	4.35%	3.03%	3.48%	1.63%	3.49%	2.78%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UIVM and FDT in my portfolio?

UIVM and FDT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UIVM or FDT?

FDT has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to UIVM (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs FDT's -46.10%.

Which ETF is better, UIVM or FDT?

On 5-year performance, FDT leads with 12.44% vs 11.91% for UIVM. On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UIVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UIVM or FDT?

Over the 5-year period, FDT has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UIVM or FDT?

UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UIVM or FDT?

UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 2.85% for FDT.

What is the main difference between UIVM and FDT?

UIVM is categorized as Momentum, while FDT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.80% for FDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.