PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UIFS.L vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UIFS.L vs. VYM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UIFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UIFS.L returned 13.52%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for VYM. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UIFS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.

Performance

UIFS.L vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UIFS.L is traded in GBp, while VYM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VYM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIFS.L achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.94% return. Over the past 10 years, UIFS.L has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 13.52%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.52% annualized return.

UIFS.L

1D
1.97%
1M
5.59%
YTD
-2.31%
6M
-2.14%
1Y
7.87%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
13.52%

VYM

1D
0.89%
1M
3.92%
YTD
12.94%
6M
10.91%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIFS.L vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIFS.L
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		-2.31%7.07%32.24%6.12%-0.45%38.07%-6.59%27.05%-9.40%12.02%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF		12.94%7.20%19.65%1.25%11.40%27.39%-1.83%19.34%-0.34%6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between UIFS.L and VYM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.53

The correlation between UIFS.L and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UIFS.L vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UIFS.L
VYM

Financial Services

98.0%
20.5%

Technology

1.7%
17.7%

Industrials

0.2%
12.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.5%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.1%

Energy

-

9.8%

Healthcare

-

12.2%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

5.7%

Financial Services

UIFS.L
98.0%
VYM
20.5%

Technology

UIFS.L
1.7%
VYM
17.7%

Industrials

UIFS.L
0.2%
VYM
12.1%

Basic Materials

UIFS.L

-

VYM
3.5%

Communication Services

UIFS.L

-

VYM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UIFS.L

-

VYM
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

UIFS.L

-

VYM
8.1%

Energy

UIFS.L

-

VYM
9.8%

Healthcare

UIFS.L

-

VYM
12.2%

Real Estate

UIFS.L

-

VYM
0.0%

Utilities

UIFS.L

-

VYM
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

Often compared with UIFS.L:
UIFS.L vs. ESIF.LUIFS.L vs. IISU.LUIFS.L vs. XLFQ.LUIFS.L vs. XUFB.LUIFS.L vs. CB5.LUIFS.L vs. QDVH.DEUIFS.L vs. WFIN.AS
Often compared with VYM:
VYM vs. SCHDVYM vs. VIGVYM vs. VYMIVYM vs. FDVVVYM vs. VOOVYM vs. VTIVYM vs. DGRO

Return for Risk

UIFS.L vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UIFS.L
UIFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UIFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIFS.L vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

UIFS.LVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.56
2.61

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.88
3.48

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.46

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

4.96

-4.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.40

17.94

-16.54

UIFS.L vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIFS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIFS.L and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIFS.L vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIFS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.49%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -38.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIFS.L and VYM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UIFS.LVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.49%

-38.23%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-5.40%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.12%

-17.47%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.12%

-17.47%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.31%

-27.08%

-8.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-0.06%

-4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-5.31%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

1.49%

+4.11%

Volatility

UIFS.L vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.09%. This indicates that UIFS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UIFS.LVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.09%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

7.78%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.10%

10.27%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.50%

13.45%

+9.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

16.77%

+5.66%

UIFS.L vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIFS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UIFS.L vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

UIFS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UIFS.L
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF		2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

UIFS.L and VYM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UIFS.L.

UIFS.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while VYM is Dividend. UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UIFS.L and 0.04% for VYM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIFS.L and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer