UIFS.L vs. CB5.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (UIFS.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF (CB5.L).
UIFS.L and CB5.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UIFS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. CB5.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Dec 4, 2008. Both UIFS.L and CB5.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UIFS.L or CB5.L.
Key characteristics
| UIFS.L | CB5.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.29% | -70.64% |
| 1Y Return | 22.25% | -68.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.09% | -25.38% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.25% | -16.52% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.80 | -0.88 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.39% | 77.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.31% | -77.77% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.29% | -76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIFS.L and CB5.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UIFS.L vs. CB5.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UIFS.L achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than CB5.L's -70.64% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UIFS.L vs. CB5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIFS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CB5.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UIFS.L vs. CB5.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (UIFS.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF (CB5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UIFS.L vs. CB5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UIFS.L nor CB5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UIFS.L vs. CB5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIFS.L drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, smaller than the maximum CB5.L drawdown of -77.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIFS.L and CB5.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UIFS.L vs. CB5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (UIFS.L) is 4.11%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF (CB5.L) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that UIFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CB5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.