UHS vs. SYF
UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) and SYF (Synchrony Financial) are both stocks. UHS operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while SYF operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, UHS returned 0.99%/yr vs 11.21%/yr for SYF. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UHS vs. SYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a -34.32% return, which is significantly lower than SYF's -14.75% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed SYF with an annualized return of 0.99%, while SYF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.21% annualized return.
UHS
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -15.82%
- YTD
- -34.32%
- 6M
- -36.67%
- 1Y
- -24.24%
- 3Y*
- 2.02%
- 5Y*
- -1.67%
- 10Y*
- 0.99%
SYF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- -14.75%
- 6M
- -10.85%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 30.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
UHS vs. SYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -34.32% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
SYF Synchrony Financial | -14.75% | 30.64% | 74.01% | 19.76% | -27.43% | 36.40% | -0.08% | 57.48% | -37.84% | 8.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between UHS and SYF is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2014 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UHS and SYF has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
UHS:
$31.29
SYF:
$9.85
UHS:
4.57
SYF:
7.16
UHS:
0.20
SYF:
0.68
UHS:
0.39
SYF:
1.30
UHS:
$17.76B
SYF:
$19.92B
UHS:
$12.01B
SYF:
$12.16B
UHS:
$2.79B
SYF:
$4.94B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UHS vs. SYF — Risk / Return Rank
UHS
SYF
UHS vs. SYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Synchrony Financial (SYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UHS | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.15 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.77 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 1.73 | -3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UHS | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.76 | 0.73 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.26 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.28 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.32 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
UHS vs. SYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum SYF drawdown of -66.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and SYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHS | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.27% | -66.37% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.52% | -27.61% | -13.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.52% | -37.75% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -46.65% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.30% | -66.37% | +10.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.30% | -19.61% | -21.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -16.99% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.71% | 12.27% | +4.44% |
Volatility
UHS vs. SYF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is 6.50%, while Synchrony Financial (SYF) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that UHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UHS | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 8.21% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.04% | 23.13% | +1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.08% | 29.15% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.80% | 36.74% | -4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.38% | 39.52% | -5.14% |
Dividends
UHS vs. SYF - Dividend Comparison
UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than SYF's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYF Synchrony Financial | 1.70% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 2.51% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 3.07% | 1.45% | 0.72% | 0.00% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.56% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Financials
UHS vs. SYF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Synchrony Financial. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UHS vs. SYF - Profitability Comparison
UHS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SYF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Synchrony Financial reported a gross profit of 4.64B and revenue of 5.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.7%.
UHS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 502.86M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
SYF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Synchrony Financial reported an operating income of 914.00M and revenue of 5.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
UHS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 348.68M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
SYF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Synchrony Financial reported a net income of 805.00M and revenue of 5.60B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UHS and SYF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SYF has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to UHS (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHS dropped -60.27% vs SYF's -66.37%.
SYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UHS and SYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer