UHS vs. GERN
UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) and GERN (Geron Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — UHS in Medical Care Facilities, GERN in Biotechnology. Over the past 10 years, UHS returned 1.11%/yr vs -6.31%/yr for GERN. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UHS vs. GERN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a -32.95% return, which is significantly lower than GERN's 2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has outperformed GERN with an annualized return of 1.11%, while GERN has yielded a comparatively lower -6.31% annualized return.
UHS
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -7.45%
- YTD
- -32.95%
- 6M
- -35.67%
- 1Y
- -15.59%
- 3Y*
- -0.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.11%
GERN
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- -4.93%
- 3Y*
- -24.68%
- 5Y*
- -2.34%
- 10Y*
- -6.31%
UHS vs. GERN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -32.95% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
GERN Geron Corporation | 2.27% | -62.71% | 67.77% | -12.81% | 98.36% | -23.27% | 16.91% | 36.00% | -44.44% | -13.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between UHS and GERN is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 1996 | 0.18 |
The correlation between UHS and GERN shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UHS:
$31.29
GERN:
-$0.10
UHS:
0.40
GERN:
4.59
UHS:
$17.76B
GERN:
$196.12M
UHS:
$12.01B
GERN:
$119.67M
UHS:
$2.79B
GERN:
-$40.62M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UHS vs. GERN — Risk / Return Rank
UHS
GERN
UHS vs. GERN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Geron Corporation (GERN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UHS | GERN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.04 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.11 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | -0.24 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UHS vs. GERN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum GERN drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and GERN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHS | GERN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.27% | -98.73% | +38.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.00% | -43.59% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.00% | -78.98% | +36.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -78.98% | +34.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.30% | -86.09% | +29.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.08% | -98.07% | +57.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.84% | -86.17% | +71.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.44% | 20.31% | -1.87% |
Volatility
UHS vs. GERN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is 8.60%, while Geron Corporation (GERN) has a volatility of 12.67%. This indicates that UHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GERN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UHS | GERN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.60% | 12.67% | -4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.53% | 46.29% | -20.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.74% | 62.88% | -31.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 81.24% | -49.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 78.09% | -43.69% |
Dividends
UHS vs. GERN - Dividend Comparison
UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while GERN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GERN Geron Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Financials
UHS vs. GERN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Geron Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UHS vs. GERN - Profitability Comparison
UHS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GERN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geron Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 51.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
UHS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 502.86M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
GERN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geron Corporation reported an operating income of 158.00K and revenue of 51.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
UHS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 348.68M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
GERN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geron Corporation reported a net income of -3.64M and revenue of 51.84M, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UHS and GERN have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GERN has higher volatility (12.67%) compared to UHS (8.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHS dropped -60.27% vs GERN's -98.73%.
GERN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UHS and GERN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer