GERN vs. ADCT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Geron Corporation (GERN) and ADC Therapeutics SA (ADCT).

Performance

GERN vs. ADCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Geron Corporation (GERN) and ADC Therapeutics SA (ADCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GERN vs. ADCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GERN Geron Corporation	12.88%	-62.71%	67.77%	-12.81%	98.36%	-23.27%	-9.14%
ADCT ADC Therapeutics SA	6.23%	77.39%	19.88%	-56.77%	-80.99%	-36.89%	7.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GERN : $994.08M ADCT : $563.63M
EPS GERN : -$0.13 ADCT : -$1.07
PS Ratio GERN : 5.40 ADCT : 6.81
Total Revenue (TTM) GERN : $183.88M ADCT : $73.55M
Gross Profit (TTM) GERN : $158.07M ADCT : $67.75M
EBITDA (TTM) GERN : -$39.32M ADCT : -$112.61M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GERN achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than ADCT's 6.23% return.

GERN

• 1D: 5.67%
• 1M: -11.31%
• YTD: 12.88%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: -6.29%
• 3Y*: -11.78%
• 5Y*: -1.66%
• 10Y*: -6.76%

ADCT

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: -8.54%
• YTD: 6.23%
• 6M: -6.25%
• 1Y: 165.96%
• 3Y*: 24.36%
• 5Y*: -31.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GERN vs. ADCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GERN

GERN Risk / Return Rank: 36
GERN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
GERN Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GERN Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GERN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GERN Martin Ratio Rank: 33

ADCT

ADCT Risk / Return Rank: 89
ADCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ADCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ADCT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ADCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ADCT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GERN vs. ADCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geron Corporation (GERN) and ADC Therapeutics SA (ADCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GERN	ADCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	1.93	-2.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	2.79	-2.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.32	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	4.98	-5.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.53	10.11	-10.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GERN vs. ADCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GERN Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the ADCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GERN and ADCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GERN	ADCT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09	1.93	-2.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	-0.33	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	-0.32	+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between GERN and ADCT is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GERN vs. ADCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither GERN nor ADCT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GERN vs. ADCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GERN drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, roughly equal to the maximum ADCT drawdown of -99.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERN and ADCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GERN	ADCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.73%	-99.08%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.95%	-30.45%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.98%	-98.51%	+19.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.87%	-92.65%	-5.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.08%	-76.88%	-9.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.29%	15.01%	+3.28%

Volatility

GERN vs. ADCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Geron Corporation (GERN) is 21.18%, while ADC Therapeutics SA (ADCT) has a volatility of 22.65%. This indicates that GERN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GERN	ADCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.18%	22.65%	-1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.58%	50.01%	-3.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.84%	86.91%	-19.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.34%	96.69%	-14.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	77.96%	92.81%	-14.85%

Financials