PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GERN vs. RMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GERN vs. RMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Geron Corporation (GERN) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GERN achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly higher than RMD's -20.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GERN has underperformed RMD with an annualized return of -6.31%, while RMD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.


GERN

1D
0.75%
1M
5.47%
YTD
2.27%
6M
1.50%
1Y
-4.93%
3Y*
-24.68%
5Y*
-2.34%
10Y*
-6.31%

RMD

1D
1.49%
1M
-8.07%
YTD
-20.18%
6M
-21.39%
1Y
-24.12%
3Y*
-2.92%
5Y*
-4.07%
10Y*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GERN vs. RMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GERN
Geron Corporation
2.27%-62.71%67.77%-12.81%98.36%-23.27%16.91%36.00%-44.44%-13.04%
RMD
ResMed Inc.
-20.18%6.26%34.18%-16.55%-19.47%23.41%38.33%37.85%36.38%39.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GERN and RMD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 1996

0.22

Fundamentals

EPS

GERN:

-$0.10

RMD:

$13.78

PS Ratio

GERN:

4.59

RMD:

3.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

GERN:

$196.12M

RMD:

$5.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GERN:

$119.67M

RMD:

$3.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

GERN:

-$40.62M

RMD:

$2.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GERN vs. RMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GERN
GERN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GERN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GERN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GERN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GERN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GERN Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

RMD
RMD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GERN vs. RMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geron Corporation (GERN) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GERNRMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.84

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

-0.65

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.24

-1.39

+1.15

GERN vs. RMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GERN Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the RMD Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GERN and RMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GERN vs. RMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GERN drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than RMD's maximum drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERN and RMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GERNRMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.73%

-61.61%

-37.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.59%

-37.28%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.98%

-40.09%

-38.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.98%

-53.99%

-24.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.09%

-53.99%

-32.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.07%

-34.39%

-63.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.17%

-16.01%

-70.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.31%

17.34%

+2.97%

Volatility

GERN vs. RMD - Volatility Comparison

Geron Corporation (GERN) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to ResMed Inc. (RMD) at 10.46%. This indicates that GERN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GERNRMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.67%

10.46%

+2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.29%

19.68%

+26.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.88%

24.43%

+38.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.24%

31.01%

+50.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.09%

31.50%

+46.59%

Dividends

GERN vs. RMD - Dividend Comparison

GERN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GERN
Geron Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RMD
ResMed Inc.
1.25%0.94%0.88%1.07%0.83%0.62%0.73%0.98%1.26%1.61%2.03%2.16%

Financials

GERN vs. RMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Geron Corporation and ResMed Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
51.84M
1.43B
(GERN) Total Revenue
(RMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GERN vs. RMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Geron Corporation and ResMed Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
62.3%
Portfolio components
GERN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geron Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 51.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.

GERN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geron Corporation reported an operating income of 158.00K and revenue of 51.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

RMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

GERN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geron Corporation reported a net income of -3.64M and revenue of 51.84M, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.

RMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GERN and RMD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GERN has higher volatility (12.67%) compared to RMD (10.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERN dropped -98.73% vs RMD's -61.61%.

GERN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GERN and RMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer