UHS vs. FUN
UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) and FUN (Cedar Fair, L.P.) are both stocks. UHS operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while FUN operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, UHS returned 1.37%/yr vs -5.82%/yr for FUN. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UHS vs. FUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a -32.68% return, which is significantly lower than FUN's 52.80% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has outperformed FUN with an annualized return of 1.37%, while FUN has yielded a comparatively lower -5.82% annualized return.
UHS
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -13.06%
- YTD
- -32.68%
- 6M
- -34.07%
- 1Y
- -14.04%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
FUN
- 1D
- -3.90%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 52.80%
- 6M
- 57.21%
- 1Y
- -21.53%
- 3Y*
- -16.99%
- 5Y*
- -11.16%
- 10Y*
- -5.82%
UHS vs. FUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -32.68% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
FUN Cedar Fair, L.P. | 52.80% | -68.17% | 26.39% | -0.96% | -16.23% | 27.25% | -27.49% | 25.65% | -22.66% | 6.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between UHS and FUN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.17 |
The correlation between UHS and FUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UHS:
$31.29
FUN:
-$16.06
UHS:
0.40
FUN:
0.82
UHS:
$17.76B
FUN:
$2.90B
UHS:
$12.01B
FUN:
$1.59B
UHS:
$2.79B
FUN:
-$733.45M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UHS vs. FUN — Risk / Return Rank
UHS
FUN
UHS vs. FUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UHS | FUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.98 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.43 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | -0.66 | -0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UHS vs. FUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum FUN drawdown of -77.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and FUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHS | FUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.27% | -77.75% | +17.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.52% | -61.05% | +19.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.52% | -77.74% | +36.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -77.74% | +32.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.30% | -77.75% | +21.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.85% | -59.33% | +19.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -19.87% | +5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.33% | 39.79% | -22.46% |
Volatility
UHS vs. FUN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is 7.25%, while Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that UHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UHS | FUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.25% | 15.26% | -8.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 44.94% | -19.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.46% | 66.85% | -35.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.82% | 44.02% | -12.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.37% | 45.15% | -10.78% |
Dividends
UHS vs. FUN - Dividend Comparison
UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while FUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUN Cedar Fair, L.P. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.42% | 3.02% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 6.69% | 7.60% | 5.32% | 5.19% | 5.51% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Financials
UHS vs. FUN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Cedar Fair, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UHS and FUN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUN has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to UHS (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHS dropped -60.27% vs FUN's -77.75%.
FUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UHS and FUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer