PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUN vs. DIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUN vs. DIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and The Walt Disney Company (DIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUN achieves a 12.97% return, which is significantly higher than DIS's -14.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FUN has underperformed DIS with an annualized return of -8.60%, while DIS has yielded a comparatively higher 0.95% annualized return.


FUN

1D
-2.09%
1M
-17.44%
6M
-3.78%
YTD
12.97%
1Y
-41.63%
3Y*
-22.07%
5Y*
-14.78%
10Y*
-8.60%
ALL TIME*
7.70%

DIS

1D
0.03%
1M
-3.33%
6M
-14.07%
YTD
-14.80%
1Y
-16.30%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-10.83%
10Y*
0.95%
ALL TIME*
10.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.15B$1.05B$1.06B
$31.14M$38.24M$46.37M

FUN vs. DIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
12.97%-68.17%26.39%-0.96%-16.23%27.25%-27.49%25.65%-22.66%6.45%
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
-14.80%3.30%24.44%4.26%-43.91%-14.51%25.27%33.51%3.61%4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FUN and DIS is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 1987

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FUN:

$1.77B

DIS:

$167.08B

EPS

FUN:

-$16.04

DIS:

$6.26

PS Ratio

FUN:

0.61

DIS:

1.77

PB Ratio

FUN:

0.20

DIS:

1.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUN:

$2.90B

DIS:

$97.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUN:

$1.59B

DIS:

$36.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

FUN:

-$733.45M

DIS:

$20.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUN vs. DIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FUN
FUN Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUN Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUN Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DIS
DIS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FUN vs. DIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUNDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.89

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

-0.82

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

-1.58

+0.48

FUN vs. DIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUN Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is comparable to the DIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUN and DIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUN vs. DIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUN drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, smaller than the maximum DIS drawdown of -85.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUN and DIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUNDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.75%

-85.66%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.21%

-22.04%

-36.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.74%

-32.86%

-44.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.74%

-57.33%

-20.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.75%

-60.72%

-17.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.93%

-50.86%

-19.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-26.83%

+6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.37%

11.44%

+26.93%

Volatility

FUN vs. DIS - Volatility Comparison

Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) has a higher volatility of 15.40% compared to The Walt Disney Company (DIS) at 8.28%. This indicates that FUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUNDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.40%

8.28%

+7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.34%

20.38%

+25.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.05%

25.59%

+42.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.64%

29.43%

+15.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.59%

28.90%

+16.69%

Dividends

FUN vs. DIS - Dividend Comparison

FUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
1.56%1.10%0.85%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.22%1.57%1.51%1.43%1.30%
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
0.00%0.00%4.42%3.02%1.45%0.00%2.38%6.69%7.60%5.32%5.19%5.51%

Financials

FUN vs. DIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cedar Fair, L.P. and The Walt Disney Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FUN and DIS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUN has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to DIS (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUN dropped -77.75% vs DIS's -85.66%.

FUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUN and DIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer