PortfoliosLab logo
FUN vs. IIPR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FUN and IIPR is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FUN vs. IIPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FUN:

-0.38

IIPR:

-1.01

Sortino Ratio

FUN:

-0.36

IIPR:

-1.24

Omega Ratio

FUN:

0.96

IIPR:

0.80

Calmar Ratio

FUN:

-0.40

IIPR:

-0.55

Martin Ratio

FUN:

-0.76

IIPR:

-1.23

Ulcer Index

FUN:

26.96%

IIPR:

35.00%

Daily Std Dev

FUN:

47.85%

IIPR:

43.45%

Max Drawdown

FUN:

-77.74%

IIPR:

-78.14%

Current Drawdown

FUN:

-41.77%

IIPR:

-74.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FUN:

$3.39B

IIPR:

$1.55B

EPS

FUN:

-$2.79

IIPR:

$5.19

PEG Ratio

FUN:

3.72

IIPR:

0.00

PS Ratio

FUN:

1.21

IIPR:

5.08

PB Ratio

FUN:

1.85

IIPR:

0.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUN:

$3.29B

IIPR:

$304.79M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUN:

$2.12B

IIPR:

$275.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

FUN:

$511.16M

IIPR:

$241.72M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUN achieves a -30.36% return, which is significantly lower than IIPR's -14.59% return.


FUN

YTD

-30.36%

1M

-3.89%

6M

-27.34%

1Y

-19.90%

3Y*

-8.76%

5Y*

2.82%

10Y*

-1.75%

IIPR

YTD

-14.59%

1M

0.42%

6M

-46.28%

1Y

-43.92%

3Y*

-18.91%

5Y*

-1.55%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cedar Fair, L.P.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FUN vs. IIPR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FUN is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FUN is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FUN is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FUN is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FUN is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FUN is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IIPR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IIPR is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IIPR is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IIPR is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IIPR is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IIPR is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IIPR is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FUN vs. IIPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FUN Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is higher than the IIPR Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUN and IIPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FUN vs. IIPR - Dividend Comparison

FUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, less than IIPR's 13.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
5.45%4.42%3.02%1.45%0.00%2.38%6.69%7.60%5.32%5.19%5.51%5.96%
IIPR
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
13.76%11.28%7.16%7.01%2.18%2.44%3.73%2.64%1.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FUN vs. IIPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUN drawdown since its inception was -77.74%, roughly equal to the maximum IIPR drawdown of -78.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUN and IIPR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FUN vs. IIPR - Volatility Comparison

Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) has a higher volatility of 13.33% compared to Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) at 8.48%. This indicates that FUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IIPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FUN vs. IIPR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cedar Fair, L.P. and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
687.31M
71.72M
(FUN) Total Revenue
(IIPR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FUN vs. IIPR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cedar Fair, L.P. and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
-3.1%
89.7%
(FUN) Gross Margin
(IIPR) Gross Margin
FUN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cedar Fair, L.P. reported a gross profit of -21.60M and revenue of 687.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -3.1%.

IIPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 64.34M and revenue of 71.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.7%.

FUN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cedar Fair, L.P. reported an operating income of -299.48M and revenue of 687.31M, resulting in an operating margin of -43.6%.

IIPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.96M and revenue of 71.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.4%.

FUN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cedar Fair, L.P. reported a net income of -219.72M and revenue of 687.31M, resulting in a net margin of -32.0%.

IIPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 31.08M and revenue of 71.72M, resulting in a net margin of 43.3%.