UGE vs. XPP
UGE (ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods) and XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - UGE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while XPP is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UGE returned 7.19%/yr vs -6.92%/yr for XPP. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UGE vs. XPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly higher than XPP's -23.10% return. Over the past 10 years, UGE has outperformed XPP with an annualized return of 7.19%, while XPP has yielded a comparatively lower -6.92% annualized return.
UGE
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.85%
- 5Y*
- -2.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
XPP
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- YTD
- -23.10%
- 1Y
- -22.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.89%
- 5Y*
- -19.56%
- 10Y*
- -6.92%
UGE vs. XPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 12.67% | -5.21% | 16.40% | 2.38% | -46.78% | 42.44% | 56.64% | 58.28% | -30.14% | 32.38% |
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | -23.10% | 45.84% | 38.18% | -34.77% | -50.06% | -40.45% | 7.07% | 24.88% | -31.36% | 80.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGE and XPP is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009 | 0.38 |
The correlation between UGE and XPP shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UGE vs. XPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UGE
XPP
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
UGE
XPP
-
Consumer Cyclical
UGE
XPP
-
Basic Materials
UGE
-
XPP
-
Communication Services
UGE
-
XPP
-
Energy
UGE
-
XPP
-
Financial Services
UGE
-
XPP
Healthcare
UGE
-
XPP
-
Industrials
UGE
-
XPP
-
Real Estate
UGE
-
XPP
-
Technology
UGE
-
XPP
-
Utilities
UGE
-
XPP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGE vs. XPP — Risk / Return Rank
UGE
XPP
UGE vs. XPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UGE | XPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.93 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | -0.49 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | -1.08 | +1.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UGE vs. XPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, smaller than the maximum XPP drawdown of -89.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and XPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGE | XPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.36% | -89.90% | +18.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -44.78% | +25.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.80% | -52.95% | +28.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.55% | -83.28% | +26.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | -89.90% | +32.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.35% | -79.65% | +43.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -48.02% | +29.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.28% | 20.43% | -9.15% |
Volatility
UGE vs. XPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) is 10.84%, while ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a volatility of 13.09%. This indicates that UGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGE | XPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 13.09% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.58% | 28.95% | -7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.89% | 39.98% | -13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 62.78% | -31.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.12% | 54.77% | -21.65% |
UGE vs. XPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UGE and XPP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UGE vs. XPP - Dividend Comparison
UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than XPP's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 2.17% | 2.54% | 1.43% | 1.20% | 0.74% | 0.20% | 0.41% | 0.86% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.76% | 0.60% |
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.96% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGE and XPP have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPP has higher volatility (13.09%) compared to UGE (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGE dropped -71.36% vs XPP's -89.90%.
On 10-year performance, UGE leads with 7.19% vs -6.92% for XPP. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UGE has been the lower-risk option at 10.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGE has performed better with a 7.19% return vs -6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UGE and XPP have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
XPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.17% for UGE.
UGE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XPP is China Equities. UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%).
UGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGE and XPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer