UFOX vs. IGV
UFOX (Defiance Connective Technologies ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - UFOX tracks the BlueStar Connective Technologies Index while IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UFOX returned 16.95%/yr vs 3.25%/yr for IGV. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UFOX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.
Performance
UFOX vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFOX achieves a 24.91% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -10.50% return.
UFOX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -10.33%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- YTD
- 24.91%
- 1Y
- 50.71%
- 3Y*
- 34.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.18%
IGV
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- -10.50%
- 1Y
- -12.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- 15.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.45B | $1.32B | $1.70B | |
| $4.02M | $3.58M | $4.72M |
UFOX vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 24.91% | 34.83% | 34.11% | 21.83% | -27.26% | 25.68% | 29.78% | 5.58% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -10.50% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 14.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFOX and IGV is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UFOX and IGV has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
UFOX vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UFOX
IGV
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
UFOX
IGV
Industrials
UFOX
IGV
Communication Services
UFOX
IGV
Real Estate
UFOX
IGV
-
Basic Materials
UFOX
-
IGV
-
Consumer Cyclical
UFOX
-
IGV
Consumer Defensive
UFOX
-
IGV
-
Energy
UFOX
-
IGV
-
Financial Services
UFOX
-
IGV
Healthcare
UFOX
-
IGV
-
Utilities
UFOX
-
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFOX vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
UFOX
IGV
UFOX vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UFOX | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.93 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | -0.42 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | -0.79 | +7.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UFOX vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFOX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFOX and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFOX | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -63.45% | +29.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.71% | -36.61% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.71% | -36.61% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.90% | -45.85% | +11.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.11% | -19.69% | -5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -14.49% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 19.35% | -11.74% |
Volatility
UFOX vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) has a higher volatility of 11.73% compared to iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) at 6.80%. This indicates that UFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFOX | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.73% | 6.80% | +4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.21% | 25.02% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.05% | 29.16% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 28.16% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 26.45% | -0.62% |
UFOX vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
UFOX vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
UFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than IGV's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 0.48% | 0.56% | 0.79% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.17% | 0.99% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFOX and IGV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFOX has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to IGV (6.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFOX dropped -33.90% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 5-year performance, UFOX leads with 16.95% vs 3.25% for IGV. On fees, UFOX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 6.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UFOX has performed better with a 16.95% return vs 3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UFOX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
UFOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
UFOX tracks BlueStar Connective Technologies Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UFOX and 0.39% for IGV.
UFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFOX and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer