UFOX vs. XLK
UFOX (Defiance Connective Technologies ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - UFOX tracks the BlueStar Connective Technologies Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UFOX returned 16.95%/yr vs 18.87%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. UFOX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
UFOX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFOX achieves a 24.91% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 22.09% return.
UFOX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -10.33%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- YTD
- 24.91%
- 1Y
- 50.71%
- 3Y*
- 34.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.18%
XLK
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- YTD
- 22.09%
- 1Y
- 37.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.87%
- 10Y*
- 23.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.02M | $3.58M | $4.72M | |
| $1.61B | $1.67B | $2.22B |
UFOX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 24.91% | 34.83% | 34.11% | 21.83% | -27.26% | 25.68% | 29.78% | 5.58% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 22.09% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 30.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFOX and XLK is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between UFOX and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
UFOX vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UFOX
XLK
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
UFOX
XLK
Industrials
UFOX
XLK
Communication Services
UFOX
XLK
Real Estate
UFOX
XLK
-
Basic Materials
UFOX
-
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
UFOX
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
UFOX
-
XLK
-
Energy
UFOX
-
XLK
Financial Services
UFOX
-
XLK
-
Healthcare
UFOX
-
XLK
-
Utilities
UFOX
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFOX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
UFOX
XLK
UFOX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UFOX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 2.16 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | 5.85 | +0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UFOX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFOX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFOX and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFOX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -82.05% | +48.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.71% | -15.92% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.71% | -25.66% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.90% | -33.56% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.11% | -11.43% | -13.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -34.80% | +25.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 5.86% | +1.75% |
Volatility
UFOX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) has a higher volatility of 11.73% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 9.58%. This indicates that UFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFOX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.73% | 9.58% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.21% | 21.81% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.05% | 25.59% | +5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 25.75% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 24.90% | +0.93% |
UFOX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
UFOX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
UFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than XLK's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 0.48% | 0.56% | 0.79% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.17% | 0.99% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFOX and XLK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFOX has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to XLK (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFOX dropped -33.90% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 18.87% vs 16.95% for UFOX. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 9.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 18.87% return vs 16.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UFOX.
UFOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.45% for XLK.
UFOX tracks BlueStar Connective Technologies Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UFOX and 0.08% for XLK.
UFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFOX and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer