UFCS vs. FORM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UFCS (United Fire Group, Inc.) and FORM (FormFactor, Inc.) are both stocks. UFCS operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while FORM operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, UFCS returned 3.47%/yr vs 32.81%/yr for FORM. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UFCS vs. FORM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) and FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFCS achieves a 19.42% return, which is significantly lower than FORM's 125.92% return. Over the past 10 years, UFCS has underperformed FORM with an annualized return of 3.47%, while FORM has yielded a comparatively higher 32.81% annualized return.

UFCS

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: 10.07%
• YTD: 19.42%
• 6M: 20.58%
• 1Y: 55.27%
• 3Y*: 27.74%
• 5Y*: 9.72%
• 10Y*: 3.47%

FORM

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -6.21%
• YTD: 125.92%
• 6M: 120.08%
• 1Y: 301.85%
• 3Y*: 58.75%
• 5Y*: 29.27%
• 10Y*: 32.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFCS vs. FORM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UFCS United Fire Group, Inc.	19.42%	30.48%	45.32%	-24.30%	20.49%	-5.52%	-40.30%	-18.87%	31.06%	-4.97%
FORM FormFactor, Inc.	125.92%	26.77%	5.49%	87.63%	-51.38%	6.28%	65.65%	84.32%	-9.97%	39.73%

Correlation

The correlation between UFCS and FORM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2003	0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between UFCS and FORM has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS UFCS : $6.59 FORM : $0.87
PE Ratio UFCS : 6.55 FORM : 144.62
PS Ratio UFCS : 0.60 FORM : 11.77
Total Revenue (TTM) UFCS : $1.43B FORM : $839.78M
Gross Profit (TTM) UFCS : $325.77M FORM : $332.34M
EBITDA (TTM) UFCS : $140.18M FORM : $97.87M

Return for Risk

UFCS vs. FORM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFCS

UFCS Risk / Return Rank: 87
UFCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
UFCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
UFCS Omega Ratio Rank: 82
UFCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
UFCS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FORM

FORM Risk / Return Rank: 96
FORM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FORM Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FORM Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FORM Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FORM Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFCS vs. FORM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) and FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UFCS	FORM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	4.47	-2.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	3.99	-1.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.55	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.54	11.79	-7.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.26	27.93	-14.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UFCS vs. FORM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the FORM Sharpe Ratio of 4.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFCS and FORM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UFCS	FORM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	4.47	-2.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.53	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	0.62	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.18	+0.05

Drawdowns

UFCS vs. FORM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFCS drawdown since its inception was -69.89%, smaller than the maximum FORM drawdown of -92.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFCS and FORM.

Drawdown Indicators

	UFCS	FORM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.89%	-92.36%	+22.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.24%	-25.80%	+13.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.94%	-62.75%	+37.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.99%	-62.75%	+14.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.51%	-64.42%	-0.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.24%	-18.74%	+6.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.49%	-51.51%	+25.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.18%	10.86%	-6.68%

Volatility

UFCS vs. FORM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) is 13.84%, while FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) has a volatility of 24.61%. This indicates that UFCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FORM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UFCS	FORM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.84%	24.61%	-10.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.47%	48.36%	-26.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.90%	68.20%	-36.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.52%	55.58%	-16.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.83%	53.11%	-14.28%

Dividends

UFCS vs. FORM - Dividend Comparison

UFCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while FORM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FORM FormFactor, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UFCS United Fire Group, Inc.	1.57%	1.76%	2.25%	3.18%	2.30%	2.59%	4.54%	2.97%	7.59%	2.39%	1.97%	2.24%

Financials

UFCS vs. FORM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between United Fire Group, Inc. and FormFactor, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

UFCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 369.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FORM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported a gross profit of 86.79M and revenue of 226.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

UFCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 369.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

FORM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.65M and revenue of 226.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

UFCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported a net income of 30.05M and revenue of 369.44M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

FORM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported a net income of 20.38M and revenue of 226.14M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UFCS and FORM in my portfolio?

UFCS and FORM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UFCS or FORM?

FORM has higher volatility (24.61%) compared to UFCS (13.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFCS dropped -69.89% vs FORM's -92.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FORM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.47 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.