PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FORM vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FORM vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FORM achieves a 124.29% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 29.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FORM has outperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 32.72%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.89% annualized return.


FORM

1D
8.73%
1M
-8.92%
YTD
124.29%
6M
123.25%
1Y
316.76%
3Y*
58.37%
5Y*
30.30%
10Y*
32.72%

SPMO

1D
1.31%
1M
14.80%
YTD
29.70%
6M
30.19%
1Y
46.28%
3Y*
42.80%
5Y*
24.51%
10Y*
20.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FORM vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
124.29%26.77%5.49%87.63%-51.38%6.28%65.65%84.32%-9.97%39.73%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
29.70%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FORM and SPMO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.47

The correlation between FORM and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FORM vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FORM
FORM Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FORM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FORM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FORM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FORM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FORM Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FORM vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FORMSPMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.68

2.64

+2.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.08

3.55

+0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.47

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.37

3.76

+8.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.55

14.67

+14.88

FORM vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FORM Sharpe Ratio is 4.68, which is higher than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FORM and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FORMSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68

2.64

+2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.28

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

1.03

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

1.01

-0.83

Drawdowns

FORM vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FORM drawdown since its inception was -92.36%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FORM and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FORMSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.36%

-30.95%

-61.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-12.70%

-13.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.75%

-20.13%

-42.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.75%

-22.74%

-40.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.42%

-30.95%

-33.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.33%

0.00%

-19.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.52%

-4.60%

-46.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.80%

3.26%

+7.54%

Volatility

FORM vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) has a higher volatility of 24.66% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 7.38%. This indicates that FORM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FORMSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.66%

7.38%

+17.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.37%

14.44%

+33.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.20%

17.65%

+50.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.61%

19.31%

+36.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.12%

20.31%

+32.81%

Dividends

FORM vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

FORM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FORM and SPMO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FORM has higher volatility (24.66%) compared to SPMO (7.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FORM dropped -92.36% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

FORM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.68 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FORM and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer