UFCS vs. AVO
UFCS (United Fire Group, Inc.) and AVO (Mission Produce, Inc.) are both stocks. UFCS operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while AVO operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, UFCS returned 18.39%/yr vs -8.23%/yr for AVO. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UFCS vs. AVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFCS achieves a 42.69% return, which is significantly higher than AVO's 8.71% return.
UFCS
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- 6M
- 44.32%
- YTD
- 42.69%
- 1Y
- 100.58%
- 3Y*
- 38.33%
- 5Y*
- 18.39%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.67%
AVO
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 3.02%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.33M | $13.41M | $16.17M | |
| $7.72M | $8.07M | $7.57M |
UFCS vs. AVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFCS United Fire Group, Inc. | 42.69% | 30.48% | 45.32% | -24.30% | 20.49% | -5.52% | 24.33% |
AVO Mission Produce, Inc. | 8.71% | -19.28% | 42.42% | -13.17% | -25.99% | 4.32% | 22.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFCS and AVO is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
UFCS:
$1.32B
AVO:
$891.00M
UFCS:
$7.41
AVO:
$0.32
UFCS:
6.93
AVO:
39.21
UFCS:
0.63
AVO:
0.72
UFCS:
$1.43B
AVO:
$1.25B
UFCS:
$325.77M
AVO:
$152.90M
UFCS:
$140.18M
AVO:
$83.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFCS vs. AVO — Risk / Return Rank
UFCS
AVO
UFCS vs. AVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) and Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UFCS | AVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.04 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.99 | 0.06 | +7.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.37 | 0.18 | +23.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UFCS vs. AVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFCS drawdown since its inception was -69.89%, which is greater than AVO's maximum drawdown of -62.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFCS and AVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFCS | AVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.89% | -62.71% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -34.09% | +21.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.94% | -34.09% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.99% | -59.54% | +11.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -44.42% | +39.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.39% | -38.17% | +11.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 12.48% | -8.30% |
Volatility
UFCS vs. AVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) is 9.52%, while Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) has a volatility of 10.50%. This indicates that UFCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFCS | AVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 10.50% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.44% | 29.12% | -5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.83% | 36.37% | -3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.42% | 35.90% | +3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.94% | 36.84% | +2.10% |
Dividends
UFCS vs. AVO - Dividend Comparison
UFCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while AVO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVO Mission Produce, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFCS United Fire Group, Inc. | 1.40% | 1.76% | 2.25% | 3.18% | 2.30% | 2.59% | 4.54% | 2.97% | 7.59% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.24% |
Financials
UFCS vs. AVO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Fire Group, Inc. and Mission Produce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UFCS vs. AVO - Profitability Comparison
UFCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 369.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AVO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.50M and revenue of 290.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.1%.
UFCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 369.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
AVO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported an operating income of -7.00M and revenue of 290.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.4%.
UFCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported a net income of 30.05M and revenue of 369.44M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
AVO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported a net income of -7.20M and revenue of 290.90M, resulting in a net margin of -2.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UFCS and AVO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVO has higher volatility (10.50%) compared to UFCS (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFCS dropped -69.89% vs AVO's -62.71%.
UFCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFCS and AVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer