PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FORM vs. ONTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FORM vs. ONTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) and Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FORM achieves a 125.92% return, which is significantly higher than ONTO's 77.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FORM has outperformed ONTO with an annualized return of 32.81%, while ONTO has yielded a comparatively lower 30.93% annualized return.


FORM

1D
0.73%
1M
-6.21%
YTD
125.92%
6M
120.08%
1Y
301.85%
3Y*
58.75%
5Y*
29.27%
10Y*
32.81%

ONTO

1D
0.70%
1M
-6.53%
YTD
77.36%
6M
77.07%
1Y
193.14%
3Y*
37.71%
5Y*
31.22%
10Y*
30.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FORM vs. ONTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
125.92%26.77%5.49%87.63%-51.38%6.28%65.65%84.32%-9.97%39.73%
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
77.36%-5.29%9.01%124.56%-32.74%112.89%30.13%33.70%9.67%-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FORM and ONTO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2003

0.48

The correlation between FORM and ONTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FORM:

$10.01B

ONTO:

$14.00B

EPS

FORM:

$0.87

ONTO:

$2.15

PE Ratio

FORM:

144.62

ONTO:

130.02

PS Ratio

FORM:

11.77

ONTO:

13.42

PB Ratio

FORM:

9.45

ONTO:

6.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

FORM:

$839.78M

ONTO:

$1.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FORM:

$332.34M

ONTO:

$502.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

FORM:

$97.87M

ONTO:

$177.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FORM vs. ONTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FORM
FORM Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FORM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FORM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FORM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FORM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FORM Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ONTO
ONTO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ONTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONTO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ONTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONTO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FORM vs. ONTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) and Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FORMONTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.44

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.79

9.60

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.93

26.80

+1.13

FORM vs. ONTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FORM Sharpe Ratio is 4.47, which is comparable to the ONTO Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FORM and ONTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FORMONTODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.47

3.53

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.57

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.61

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.21

-0.03

Drawdowns

FORM vs. ONTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FORM drawdown since its inception was -92.36%, smaller than the maximum ONTO drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FORM and ONTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FORMONTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.36%

-98.56%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-20.24%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.75%

-62.82%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.75%

-62.82%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.42%

-62.82%

-1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.74%

-9.06%

-9.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.51%

-54.74%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.86%

7.24%

+3.62%

Volatility

FORM vs. ONTO - Volatility Comparison

FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) has a higher volatility of 24.61% compared to Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) at 17.35%. This indicates that FORM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FORMONTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.61%

17.35%

+7.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.36%

41.14%

+7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.20%

55.20%

+13.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.58%

55.24%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.11%

51.13%

+1.98%

Dividends

FORM vs. ONTO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FORM nor ONTO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FORM vs. ONTO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FormFactor, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
226.14M
291.95M
(FORM) Total Revenue
(ONTO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FORM vs. ONTO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FormFactor, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
38.4%
50.1%
Portfolio components
FORM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported a gross profit of 86.79M and revenue of 226.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

ONTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported a gross profit of 146.39M and revenue of 291.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.

FORM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.65M and revenue of 226.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

ONTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported an operating income of 33.51M and revenue of 291.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

FORM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported a net income of 20.38M and revenue of 226.14M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

ONTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported a net income of 33.75M and revenue of 291.95M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FORM and ONTO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FORM has higher volatility (24.61%) compared to ONTO (17.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FORM dropped -92.36% vs ONTO's -98.56%.

FORM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.47 vs 3.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FORM and ONTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer