FORM vs. ONTO
FORM (FormFactor, Inc.) and ONTO (Onto Innovation Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — FORM in Semiconductors, ONTO in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, FORM returned 32.81%/yr vs 30.93%/yr for ONTO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FORM vs. ONTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FORM achieves a 125.92% return, which is significantly higher than ONTO's 77.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FORM has outperformed ONTO with an annualized return of 32.81%, while ONTO has yielded a comparatively lower 30.93% annualized return.
FORM
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- 125.92%
- 6M
- 120.08%
- 1Y
- 301.85%
- 3Y*
- 58.75%
- 5Y*
- 29.27%
- 10Y*
- 32.81%
ONTO
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -6.53%
- YTD
- 77.36%
- 6M
- 77.07%
- 1Y
- 193.14%
- 3Y*
- 37.71%
- 5Y*
- 31.22%
- 10Y*
- 30.93%
FORM vs. ONTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FORM FormFactor, Inc. | 125.92% | 26.77% | 5.49% | 87.63% | -51.38% | 6.28% | 65.65% | 84.32% | -9.97% | 39.73% |
ONTO Onto Innovation Inc. | 77.36% | -5.29% | 9.01% | 124.56% | -32.74% | 112.89% | 30.13% | 33.70% | 9.67% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FORM and ONTO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2003 | 0.48 |
The correlation between FORM and ONTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FORM:
$10.01B
ONTO:
$14.00B
FORM:
$0.87
ONTO:
$2.15
FORM:
144.62
ONTO:
130.02
FORM:
11.77
ONTO:
13.42
FORM:
9.45
ONTO:
6.57
FORM:
$839.78M
ONTO:
$1.03B
FORM:
$332.34M
ONTO:
$502.93M
FORM:
$97.87M
ONTO:
$177.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FORM vs. ONTO — Risk / Return Rank
FORM
ONTO
FORM vs. ONTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) and Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FORM | ONTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.47 | 3.53 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.99 | 3.53 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.44 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.79 | 9.60 | +2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.93 | 26.80 | +1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FORM | ONTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.47 | 3.53 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.61 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.21 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FORM vs. ONTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FORM drawdown since its inception was -92.36%, smaller than the maximum ONTO drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FORM and ONTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FORM | ONTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.36% | -98.56% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.80% | -20.24% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.75% | -62.82% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.75% | -62.82% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.42% | -62.82% | -1.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.74% | -9.06% | -9.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.51% | -54.74% | +3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.86% | 7.24% | +3.62% |
Volatility
FORM vs. ONTO - Volatility Comparison
FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) has a higher volatility of 24.61% compared to Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) at 17.35%. This indicates that FORM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FORM | ONTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.61% | 17.35% | +7.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.36% | 41.14% | +7.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.20% | 55.20% | +13.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.58% | 55.24% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.11% | 51.13% | +1.98% |
Dividends
FORM vs. ONTO - Dividend Comparison
Neither FORM nor ONTO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FORM vs. ONTO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FormFactor, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FORM vs. ONTO - Profitability Comparison
FORM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported a gross profit of 86.79M and revenue of 226.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.
ONTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported a gross profit of 146.39M and revenue of 291.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
FORM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.65M and revenue of 226.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.
ONTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported an operating income of 33.51M and revenue of 291.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
FORM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FormFactor, Inc. reported a net income of 20.38M and revenue of 226.14M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
ONTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported a net income of 33.75M and revenue of 291.95M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FORM and ONTO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FORM has higher volatility (24.61%) compared to ONTO (17.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FORM dropped -92.36% vs ONTO's -98.56%.
FORM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.47 vs 3.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FORM and ONTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer