PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFCS vs. EIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UFCS vs. EIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) and Edison International (EIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFCS achieves a 19.42% return, which is significantly lower than EIX's 21.24% return. Over the past 10 years, UFCS has underperformed EIX with an annualized return of 3.47%, while EIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.03% annualized return.


UFCS

1D
-1.19%
1M
10.07%
YTD
19.42%
6M
20.58%
1Y
55.27%
3Y*
27.74%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
3.47%

EIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.70%
YTD
21.24%
6M
27.00%
1Y
34.05%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
4.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFCS vs. EIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UFCS
United Fire Group, Inc.
19.42%30.48%45.32%-24.30%20.49%-5.52%-40.30%-18.87%31.06%-4.97%
EIX
Edison International
21.24%-20.42%15.24%17.37%-2.58%13.59%-12.75%37.61%-6.65%-9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between UFCS and EIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.19

Fundamentals

EPS

UFCS:

$6.59

EIX:

$9.61

PE Ratio

UFCS:

6.55

EIX:

7.37

PEG Ratio

UFCS:

0.03

EIX:

0.09

PS Ratio

UFCS:

0.60

EIX:

1.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

UFCS:

$1.43B

EIX:

$19.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UFCS:

$325.77M

EIX:

$4.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

UFCS:

$140.18M

EIX:

$6.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UFCS vs. EIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFCS
UFCS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
UFCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFCS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
UFCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFCS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EIX
EIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFCS vs. EIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) and Edison International (EIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UFCSEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.32

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

1.82

+1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

3.08

+1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.26

7.84

+5.42

UFCS vs. EIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the EIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFCS and EIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UFCSEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.32

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.38

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.14

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.33

-0.10

Drawdowns

UFCS vs. EIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFCS drawdown since its inception was -69.89%, roughly equal to the maximum EIX drawdown of -72.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFCS and EIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UFCSEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.89%

-72.18%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-11.11%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.94%

-43.88%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.99%

-43.88%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.51%

-43.88%

-20.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.24%

-12.82%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.49%

-15.03%

-11.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

4.97%

-0.79%

Volatility

UFCS vs. EIX - Volatility Comparison

United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) has a higher volatility of 13.84% compared to Edison International (EIX) at 6.53%. This indicates that UFCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UFCSEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.84%

6.53%

+7.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.47%

17.15%

+4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.90%

25.89%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.52%

25.38%

+14.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.83%

28.04%

+10.79%

Dividends

UFCS vs. EIX - Dividend Comparison

UFCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than EIX's 4.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIX
Edison International
4.81%5.51%2.93%4.19%4.46%3.94%4.10%3.28%4.28%3.53%2.75%2.93%
UFCS
United Fire Group, Inc.
1.57%1.76%2.25%3.18%2.30%2.59%4.54%2.97%7.59%2.39%1.97%2.24%

Financials

UFCS vs. EIX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Fire Group, Inc. and Edison International. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
369.44M
4.10B
(UFCS) Total Revenue
(EIX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UFCS vs. EIX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between United Fire Group, Inc. and Edison International over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
UFCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 369.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Edison International reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UFCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 369.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

EIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Edison International reported an operating income of 1.07B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

UFCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported a net income of 30.05M and revenue of 369.44M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

EIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Edison International reported a net income of 570.00M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UFCS and EIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UFCS has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to EIX (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFCS dropped -69.89% vs EIX's -72.18%.

UFCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UFCS and EIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer