UEVM vs. JMOM
UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - UEVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UEVM returned 8.36%/yr vs 13.81%/yr for JMOM. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UEVM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
UEVM vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 20.54% return.
UEVM
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.82%
JMOM
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 25.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.82M | $11.76M | $9.25M | |
| $142.75K | $200.41K | $201.25K |
UEVM vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 9.19% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 17.41% | -14.60% | 11.09% | 3.77% | 10.71% | -16.96% | 2.73% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 20.54% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEVM and JMOM is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.56 |
The correlation between UEVM and JMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UEVM vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UEVM
JMOM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
UEVM
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
UEVM
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
UEVM
JMOM
Industrials
UEVM
JMOM
Healthcare
UEVM
JMOM
Technology
UEVM
JMOM
Basic Materials
UEVM
JMOM
Energy
UEVM
JMOM
Utilities
UEVM
JMOM
Real Estate
UEVM
JMOM
Communication Services
UEVM
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEVM vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
UEVM
JMOM
UEVM vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UEVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 3.66 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 13.51 | -7.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UEVM vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -34.31% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -8.02% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.88% | -19.51% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.55% | -28.26% | +1.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -4.22% | +2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.53% | -6.25% | -5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.16% | +1.21% |
Volatility
UEVM vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) is 4.13%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that UEVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 5.42% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 14.02% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 16.54% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 19.00% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 20.17% | -1.81% |
UEVM vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEVM vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than JMOM's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.75% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 2.66% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UEVM and JMOM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to UEVM (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 13.81% vs 8.36% for UEVM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.75% for JMOM.
UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UEVM and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer