UEVM vs. IEMG
UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UEVM returned 7.98%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for IEMG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UEVM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
UEVM vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 28.97% return.
UEVM
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 28.97%
- 6M
- 30.48%
- 1Y
- 53.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
UEVM vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.47% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 17.41% | -14.60% | 11.09% | 3.77% | 10.71% | -16.96% | 3.04% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 28.97% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 4.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEVM and IEMG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between UEVM and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
UEVM vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UEVM
IEMG
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
UEVM
IEMG
Technology
UEVM
IEMG
Industrials
UEVM
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
UEVM
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
UEVM
IEMG
Healthcare
UEVM
IEMG
Energy
UEVM
IEMG
Basic Materials
UEVM
IEMG
Utilities
UEVM
IEMG
Real Estate
UEVM
IEMG
Communication Services
UEVM
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEVM vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
UEVM
IEMG
UEVM vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UEVM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.47 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 4.05 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.77 | 14.87 | -7.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UEVM vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEVM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -38.71% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -13.21% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.88% | -17.21% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.73% | -35.75% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | 0.00% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -12.94% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 3.59% | -0.60% |
Volatility
UEVM vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) is 5.97%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.67%. This indicates that UEVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEVM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 10.67% | -4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 19.30% | -6.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 21.44% | -5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 18.84% | -2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 20.21% | -1.80% |
UEVM vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEVM vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than IEMG's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.09% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 2.79% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UEVM and IEMG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to UEVM (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 5-year performance, IEMG leads with 8.45% vs 7.98% for UEVM. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 8.45% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.09% for IEMG.
UEVM is categorized as Momentum, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.09% for IEMG.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UEVM and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer