PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEVM vs. EEMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEVM vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return.


UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*

EEMO

1D
-1.32%
1M
18.59%
YTD
40.25%
6M
41.33%
1Y
57.41%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEVM vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%11.09%3.77%10.71%-16.96%3.70%
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
40.25%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between UEVM and EEMO is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.81

The correlation between UEVM and EEMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

UEVM vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UEVM
EEMO

Financial Services

17.7%
18.0%

Technology

15.5%
43.8%

Industrials

8.7%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
1.2%

Energy

5.2%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
3.2%

Basic Materials

4.6%
12.9%

Healthcare

4.4%
3.0%

Utilities

4.1%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.8%
0.5%

Communication Services

2.0%
1.5%

Financial Services

UEVM
17.7%
EEMO
18.0%

Technology

UEVM
15.5%
EEMO
43.8%

Industrials

UEVM
8.7%
EEMO
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

UEVM
5.5%
EEMO
1.2%

Energy

UEVM
5.2%
EEMO
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UEVM
5.0%
EEMO
3.2%

Basic Materials

UEVM
4.6%
EEMO
12.9%

Healthcare

UEVM
4.4%
EEMO
3.0%

Utilities

UEVM
4.1%
EEMO
2.0%

Real Estate

UEVM
2.8%
EEMO
0.5%

Communication Services

UEVM
2.0%
EEMO
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEVM vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEVM vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEVMEEMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.91

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

15.67

-7.02

UEVM vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEVM and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UEVMEEMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.36

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.37

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.13

+0.19

Drawdowns

UEVM vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and EEMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEVMEEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-48.47%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-14.75%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-26.06%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-34.03%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-1.32%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-20.17%

+8.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.67%

-0.78%

Volatility

UEVM vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) is 5.15%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that UEVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEVMEEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

14.32%

-9.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

22.10%

-9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

24.45%

-9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

19.33%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

21.59%

-3.20%

UEVM vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEVM vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than EEMO's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.64%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEVM and EEMO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

On 5-year performance, UEVM leads with 7.55% vs 7.19% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UEVM has performed better with a 7.55% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.64% for EEMO.

UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEVM and EEMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer